Crimson Dynamo 128 Posted October 14, 2013 Share Posted October 14, 2013 Cara Sulieman @carasulieman 32s Petitioners say that, anyway, Rangers received an "on the face of it" authenticated motion & it should go to AGM. Expand Reply Retweet Favorite Cara Sulieman @carasulieman 1m Petitioners are arguing enough evidence was submitted to Rangers to authenticate the signatures. Expand Cara Sulieman @carasulieman 3m Rangers are arguing they didn't accept motion as it was not authenticated. They say 3 signatures were not authenticated. Sums the whole thing up - If these guys wanted to be taken seriously it should have been done right, then they wouldn't be having to do this. It just gives the board loopholes to escape through 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted October 14, 2013 Share Posted October 14, 2013 I think we are missing the bigger point here though.... The Board like to think they are open, transparent and approachable. So here they have business-minded people who believe they have something to offer the club, who want their names put forward - and we have a Board who are trying to use legal loopholes to protect themselves and deny the shareholders an opportunity for an open, democratic process. It stinks. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crimson Dynamo 128 Posted October 14, 2013 Share Posted October 14, 2013 I think we are missing the bigger point here though.... The Board like to think they are open, transparent and approachable. So here they have business-minded people who believe they have something to offer the club, who want their names put forward - and we have a Board who are trying to use legal loopholes to protect themselves and deny the shareholders an opportunity for an open, democratic process. It stinks. Of course, but from the boards actions over the last 18 months we know differently, the requisitioners know this as well, yet still gave them a loophole and by making the argument that the requisition is good on the face says to me it was a basic error they made 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,562 Posted October 14, 2013 Author Share Posted October 14, 2013 Decision at 15:30 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darthter 542 Posted October 14, 2013 Share Posted October 14, 2013 Cara Sulieman @carasulieman 1m Lord Tyre has retired to make his decision. Will return sometime after 3.30pm. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted October 14, 2013 Share Posted October 14, 2013 I think we are missing the bigger point here though.... The Board like to think they are open, transparent and approachable. So here they have business-minded people who believe they have something to offer the club, who want their names put forward - and we have a Board who are trying to use legal loopholes to protect themselves and deny the shareholders an opportunity for an open, democratic process. It stinks. Exactly. The board have been going to great lengths trying to make McColl, Murray & co jump through hoops in this saga. First it was the board delaying and stalling the initial proceedings, then eventually demanding that the requisitioners provide proof of shareholding for each individual signatory on the original requisition. Now they've moved on to demanding certified signatures from signatories for actual investors. The boards stalling and blocking tactics completely stink. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTP 0 Posted October 14, 2013 Share Posted October 14, 2013 Court is back in. Refresh buttons at the ready ............... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darthter 542 Posted October 14, 2013 Share Posted October 14, 2013 Cara Sulieman @carasulieman 11s Lord Tyre has granted an interim interdict preventing the AGM from going ahead on Oct 24. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTP 0 Posted October 14, 2013 Share Posted October 14, 2013 Lord Tyre has granted an interim interdict preventing the AGM from going ahead on the 24 Oct 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted October 14, 2013 Share Posted October 14, 2013 And on that roundabout we jump back on. Seriously, we should be having a vote of no confidence in the current encumbents. Pissing money up a wall all to protect themselves. Lets not be kidded, their action to defend this request is being done to defend themselves, NOT the club. Get them out. Bunch of fuckwits ! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.