Frankie 8,562 Posted October 14, 2013 Share Posted October 14, 2013 Toyed with the idea of writing a 'match' preview for this but we'll just go for the thread instead. Case opened at 10am but has been adjourned until 11 so lawyers for Rangers can read over a late submission from the Requisitioner who seek to have an open vote at the AGM on current and nominated board members. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,624 Posted October 14, 2013 Share Posted October 14, 2013 Not very impressive by the requestioners if they are hitting the board with a submission today. That won't go down well in court. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,562 Posted October 14, 2013 Author Share Posted October 14, 2013 Not very impressive by the requestioners if they are hitting the board with a submission today. That won't go down well in court. Might be a compromise to avoid wasting more court time - might be important new evidence for the judge to consider. Who knows! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darthter 542 Posted October 14, 2013 Share Posted October 14, 2013 If the requisition is refused, who is able to stand for election against the current board??? Is it possible for someone in the room to propose A N Other on the spot??? If that isn't possible, and the current board don't get re-elected....where does that leave us??? If there are no replacements, do they keep their positions by default??? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted October 14, 2013 Share Posted October 14, 2013 If the requisition is refused, who is able to stand for election against the current board??? Is it possible for someone in the room to propose A N Other on the spot??? If that isn't possible, and the current board don't get re-elected....where does that leave us??? If there are no replacements, do they keep their positions by default??? i think the nomad takes over and appoints people. or maybe king. can't be done ad hock certainly. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,562 Posted October 14, 2013 Author Share Posted October 14, 2013 If the case is refused then there will probably be an EGM called to vote upon any nominations not included at the AGM. Moreover, even if the requisitioners win today and help ensure the present directors are voted out at the AGM then I'd still expect another EGM called by those voted off - if indeed they hold as much clout as they claim. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted October 14, 2013 Share Posted October 14, 2013 egm has to be a certain length of time after the agm. 4 weeks? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waltersgotstyle 307 Posted October 14, 2013 Share Posted October 14, 2013 Can't we all just get along... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,562 Posted October 14, 2013 Author Share Posted October 14, 2013 egm has to be a certain length of time after the agm. 4 weeks? No idea but I'd fancy it would take 3 weeks minimum. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted October 14, 2013 Share Posted October 14, 2013 there's definitely a limit and it's more than 3 weeks. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.