Sons of. Struth statement

[simplythebest 0]

and filled there pockets in a huge way along the way.

 

think were we might be financially if we had been bought by people with the club at there heart.

They had their chances during admin though, maybe even before that (I accept Dave King's hands were tied).

[the gunslinger 3,366]

They had their chances during admin though, maybe even before that (I accept Dave King's hands were tied).

 

 

that doesn't mean we have to accept millions going out. or the people taking it.

 

time the fans had a voice imho. infact it's long past time we were put first.

[simplythebest 0]

that doesn't mean we have to accept millions going out. or the people taking it.

 

time the fans had a voice imho. infact it's long past time we were put first.

Does it have to be one extreme or another though?

[the gunslinger 3,366]

Does it have to be one extreme or another though?

 

not if some contrition was evident perhaps.

 

really the shareholders will decide how extreme things get i suppose.

[craig 5,199]

It's a fact the club was not liquidated.

 

I didn't get as far as that next statement you quote, reeks of too little too late tbh.

 

Semantics.

 

You and derBerliner make good bed buddies on that point....

[Mountain Bear 0]

Their three aims all sound very well and good but ultimately they are simply a 'sack the board' campaign, nothing will change their minds. The way they are trying to hijack football games (one of the few escapes from the boardroom nonsense) is an embarrassment and the constant use of 'Spivs' like a child that's learned a new word they like is pathetic.

 

People can go over the top with insults yes but I had a proper look at their FB page for the first time and they sound like they're always spoiling for an argument. I have no sympathy and the sooner they disband the better.

 

If anything, they are guilty of trying to challenge some of the more extreme reactions they receive. If you characterise that as spoiling for a fight, then so be it, but I don't.

 

The real issue for me is that some people (and I don't necessarily mean you) seem to equate any criticism, or even questioning, of the Board as a form of disloyalty to the Club which cannot be tolerated. That is just bizarre.

[Zappa 0]

Boo hoo.

 

These tossers now spend more time complaining about Bears' attitudes towards them than anything else.

 

It makes them look more and more like ******** (although I'm not saying that's what they are...they just act like it).

 

You can be excused simply because you're new here BB (welcome btw!), but please note for future reference that on Gersnet using terms like "tossers" and "t*rriers" to describe fellow fans isn't acceptable.

[simplythebest 0]

If anything, they are guilty of trying to challenge some of the more extreme reactions they receive. If you characterise that as spoiling for a fight, then so be it, but I don't.

 

The real issue for me is that some people (and I don't necessarily mean you) seem to equate any criticism, or even questioning, of the Board as a form of disloyalty to the Club which cannot be tolerated. That is just bizarre.

Questioning and criticism is fine, it's necessary in fact but nobody can say SS are just doing that.

[Beetle Bailey 0]

You can be excused simply because you're new here BB (welcome btw!), but please note for future reference that on Gersnet using terms like "tossers" and "t*rriers" to describe fellow fans isn't acceptable.

 

I appreciate the info Zappa, and will refrain in future.