Jump to content

 

 

Rangers fans urged to continue protests


Recommended Posts

It is FACTS I want, not spin, maybe they could get Leggo to fabricate something.[/QUOT

 

Have the current Board told us what their plans for the future are. For example Mather said we didn't need more money and then we're told that Easdale is in London (was it?) looking for more investment.

 

Oh and how did Mather get on with his job "assisting youth development" at Rangers. How much work and time did he put into that?

 

The IPO stated we would need further investment at some point, that point will be determined by how fast the rebels devalue the brand.

 

I don't know much about the youth setup but Mather must have did alright as he got promoted to CEO and got Walter's seal of approval.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not so long ago you'd have backed a "Bring Back Chuck" campaign and held up a banner with "We are all Charles Green" written on it, so I'm not surprised you don't support the current protests against the puppets in our boardroom. :laugh:

 

I just don't understand it all tbh, 'sack the board' and get who in?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm looking forward to the clubs lawyers handing over to Leggat a letter from the SFO stating there has been no complaint made against RIFC and they are not investigating any complaint against RIFC something that the clubs lawyers have so far been unable to do. I wonder why?

 

Leggo fabricated the story it is up to him to prove it's true. It is not the boards or indeed the SFO's job to disprove cranks. Leggo bottled it as he had no evidence or why would he pull the blog.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Leggo fabricated the story it is up to him to prove it's true. It is not the boards or indeed the SFO's job to disprove cranks. Leggo bottled it as he had no evidence or why would he pull the blog.

 

He pulled the blog because he was served with an interdict instructing to do so.

 

If indeed that were the case that Leggat had indeed bottled it then it wouldn't be scheduled to return to court next week would it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

He pulled the blog because he was served with an interdict instructing to do so.

 

If indeed that were the case that Leggat had indeed bottled it then it wouldn't be scheduled to return to court next week would it?

 

Will Leggate have the money to defend the Board's application for a permanent interdict?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.