Bluedell 5,624 Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 What is sad is that this is far more likely From FF At 7.18pm this evening I received an email from a solicitor acting on behalf of Rangers saying that a post had been made on the site which appeared to incite an attack on the car and home by a director. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super_Ally 0 Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 Sons Of Struth meeting,organising a protest at todays game info here: https://www.facebook.com/SonsOfStruth Cheers mate. And what about the "threats" though? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,721 Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 Cheers mate. And what about the "threats" though? Didn't see it mate,it was a post on FF which was removed 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,562 Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 (edited) According to The Sun, this is the 'threat': A user had called for fans to get in touch in private about a demo and complained when only two did. Another poster responded : "What's your plan? Why the secrecy ? For all we know you could be planning to torch Stockbridges car/house or hold a protest banner up outside the ground. Folk might be up for one but not the other". Edited September 28, 2013 by Frankie 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super_Ally 0 Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 According to The Sun, this is the 'threat': A user had called for fans to get in touch in private about a demo and complained when only two did. Another poster responded : "What's your plan? Why the secrecy ? For all we know you could be planning to torch Stockbridges car/house or hold a protest banner up outside the ground. Folk might be up for one but not the other". That's a joke then as that is not a threat. Club wasting our money. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 (edited) According to The Sun, this is the 'threat': A user had called for fans to get in touch in private about a demo and complained when only two did. Another poster responded : "What's your plan? Why the secrecy ? For all we know you could be planning to torch Stockbridges car/house or hold a protest banner up outside the ground. Folk might be up for one but not the other". If this is true, then the police should dismiss the complaint out of hand. However, the person who posted it wasn't too clever, the meaning is clear but by saying "For all we know you could be planning to torch Stockbridges car/house or hold a protest banner up outside the ground. Folk might be up for one but not the other" it might imply that folks were up for the wrong thing; it would have been better to say "For all we know you could be planning to hold a protest banner up outside the ground or torch Stockbridges car/house. Folk might be up for one but not the other". Police/lawyer note: I am not making any such suggestions. Edit: It would have been better not to say it at all. Edited September 28, 2013 by BrahimHemdani 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 According to The Sun, this is the 'threat': A user had called for fans to get in touch in private about a demo and complained when only two did. Another poster responded : "What's your plan? Why the secrecy ? For all we know you could be planning to torch Stockbridges car/house or hold a protest banner up outside the ground. Folk might be up for one but not the other". Are you sure you won't get a call from a lawyer for repeating it? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calgacus 8 Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 What is sad is that this is far more likely Sadly, such is my mistrust of the Club's PR machine, I wouldn't be surprised if the post was made by an agent provocateur working for Irvine. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,562 Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 Are you sure you won't get a call from a lawyer for repeating it? I'm quoting from The Sun. I'd imagine Irvine released the information to that paper. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 I'm quoting from The Sun. I'd imagine Irvine released the information to that paper. Yes, but you are an easier target than the Sun, so long as you are sure you are on safe ground. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.