the gunslinger 3,366 Posted August 20, 2013 Share Posted August 20, 2013 Read the statement again. It is premature to believe that there will be a swing of less than one. Pathetic! Compared with much that has been happening for many months now, what is a holding statement is hardly pathetic. If the eventual action is inadequate, along with others, I will identify with the description "pathetic" but surely it is not unreasonable to allow time to see what the outcome is. Its a pathetic opening offer then 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,743 Posted August 20, 2013 Share Posted August 20, 2013 Reading some of the stuff makes you feel like you watch a poker contest or the like. "not good enough", "weakness" ... well, some are really caught up in this new extravagant Rangers multi-shareholder-battle stuff. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Moon 1,289 Posted August 20, 2013 Share Posted August 20, 2013 No compromise for me. Take it to EGM and get rid of the lot of them. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted August 20, 2013 Share Posted August 20, 2013 This 'good guy' stuff is so naive it isn't true. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,114 Posted August 20, 2013 Share Posted August 20, 2013 I agree with that; what I really meant was split them off P Murray, who is small fry compared to Blin. MColl doesn't want a seat on the Board, so my guess is they will jettison Murray and accept the offer to put Blin on in exchange for Stockbridge and perhaps Mather, thereby avoiding the open warfare of an EGM. I very much doubt that McColl would cast aside Paul Murray in that way. Interestingly idea, though perhaps Paul Murray would be replaced by the signatory next after him, but then again that won't do will it? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anchorman 0 Posted August 20, 2013 Share Posted August 20, 2013 This 'good guy' stuff is so naive it isn't true. What do you mean? McColl? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,114 Posted August 20, 2013 Share Posted August 20, 2013 What do you mean? McColl? He's still in mourning for Chuckles. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted August 20, 2013 Share Posted August 20, 2013 I very much doubt that McColl would cast aside Paul Murray in that way. I don't know that it would be portrayed as "casting aside". If they get 2 of their 3 targets, they might settle for 1 on 2 off rather than the turkey shoot of an EGM in pursuit of 2 on 3 off. Then it's just Paul, would you like to stand aside for the good of the Club etc etc. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted August 20, 2013 Share Posted August 20, 2013 What do you mean? McColl? No, the general concept that there are simply good and bad guys in this. Clearly not that simple. For what it's worth i'd welcome Blin. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54andcounting 0 Posted August 20, 2013 Share Posted August 20, 2013 This 'good guy' stuff is so naive it isn't true. I know mate... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.