Jump to content

 

 

Requisition Of General Meeting - Paul Murray wants in


Recommended Posts

I am on RM also Anchorman which largely shares my views on Green, so I can handle fighting a bit on a lone battle for a change. :D

 

Just as well 'cos this lightweight is going to his scratcher. P.S. you are talking shite :D:thup::cheers:

Link to post
Share on other sites

A proposal is made to call an EGM that will add one of the most respected businessmen in the country to the Rangers board and you wouldn't say that's good news.

I'm done with this, it's not a debate, you don't listen to reason or read what is in front of you.

 

Nail on head.

 

Despite protestations of no being overly pro-Green.... STB shows little positivism when w cut ally get a renowned, respected, intelligent businessman at the table.

 

Confused.com

Link to post
Share on other sites

A proposal is made to call an EGM that will add one of the most respected businessmen in the country to the Rangers board and you wouldn't say that's good news.

I'm done with this, it's not a debate, you don't listen to reason or read what is in front of you.

 

Blin being added is only one element to this EGM.

 

By all means go off in a huff though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

GS - I have respect for you as you know but how can you define these muppets that ultimately placed a tin pot bid involving latter participation of the champions league? There's more chance of pigs flying than that happening?

 

They are tinks and idiots

 

Blin was part of that bid ? Didn't think so

Link to post
Share on other sites

'CVA or nothing', their own words, highly indicates they wouldn't even consider the newco back up.

 

Chuck himself admitted on more than one occasion that things change....

 

We agreed with Whyte Re CVA but when that didn't happen we shafted him.... Or words to that effect.

 

Difference is that nobody else got the chance to change their bid for the club.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chuck himself admitted on more than one occasion that things change....

 

We agreed with Whyte Re CVA but when that didn't happen we shafted him.... Or words to that effect.

 

Difference is that nobody else got the chance to change their bid for the club.

So we're actually agreed that if TBK had swallowed their pride a bit there's a much better chance they'd be owning the club now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So we're actually agreed that if TBK had swallowed their pride a bit there's a much better chance they'd be owning the club now?

 

No, not at all. D and P closed the door on any bids when they made Chuck's group preferred bidders brought both admin and newco, TBK never got the chance to re-bid for t assets.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.