Green is back

[the gunslinger 3,366]

He's probably more qualified than any of us for the job.

 

so what. was it a choice between us and him

[the gunslinger 3,366]

if it was they should have chosen me.

[simplythebest 0]

I don't especially think Jon Daly has the skills to be a Rangers player, still he's better equipped for it than I am.

[craig 5,199]

He's probably more qualified than any of us for the job.

 

Are you for fucking real ?

 

Bluebell, for one, would run rings round Charlie in BOTH positions... And much as though I AM a modest person, I am also VERY certain that I have more appropriate skills than Chuck for both jobs. And, guess what.... I also think there ate others who would fulfill the position better than Green.

 

I actually find it mildly amusing you hold him in such high regard.

 

Tell you what,.... Tell me, just what relevant skills does he bring to the table for either position aside from te fact his chums have more than 50% of the shareholding ????

[craig 5,199]

so what. was it a choice between us and him

 

But he isn't, trust me ! It is a pointless point.... He isn't better than any of us.... At least not a better choice than al, of us anyway...

[andy steel 0]

A question for those who understand the financials:

 

With Charles inside the boardroom, does it make it easier or harder for whoever is eventually going to buy his group out to actually do so? It seems (from my position of ignorance) that if Charles & an ally of Paul Murray have that arena in which to get the deal thrashed out, it could actually push it along rather than hinder it.

 

I mean, Charles/Zeus hold the shares whether he's inside or not, right?

[craig 5,199]

I don't especially think Jon Daly has the skills to be a Rangers player, still he's better equipped for it than I am.

 

Jon Daly IS a football player though.... Chuck isn't a shareholder relations professional.... Nor has the skills to do capital restructuring....

[craig 5,199]

A question for those who understand the financials:

 

With Charles inside the boardroom, does it make it easier or harder for whoever is eventually going to buy his group out to actually do so? It seems (from my position of ignorance) that if Charles & an ally of Paul Murray have that arena in which to get the deal thrashed out, it could actually push it along rather than hinder it.

 

I mean, Charles/Zeus hold the shares whether he's inside or not, right?

 

As a consultant he holds no sway. Being a consultant means little to be fair, he can still exert his influence as a shareholder.

[andy steel 0]

I had heard that he was hell bent on being reappointed as director, though.

[Bluedell 5,723]

A question for those who understand the financials:

 

With Charles inside the boardroom, does it make it easier or harder for whoever is eventually going to buy his group out to actually do so? It seems (from my position of ignorance) that if Charles & an ally of Paul Murray have that arena in which to get the deal thrashed out, it could actually push it along rather than hinder it.

 

I mean, Charles/Zeus hold the shares whether he's inside or not, right?

 

Is Green actually in the boardroom though? I don't think he's been appointed as a director.

 

Generally I'd say that it wouldn't make a huge amount of difference , although having access to information that could be passed onto prospective buyers may be useful.