chilledbear 16 Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 http://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/418966/Rangers-pull-Boris-Pandza-offer?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+daily-express-scotland+%28Daily+Express+%3A%3A+Scotland+Feed BORIS Pandza has been left fuming after being told his Rangers move is off unless Ally McCoist can get players out the door. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted August 1, 2013 Author Share Posted August 1, 2013 Happy a bit of sense being shown, unhappy we have so many players who are not good enough. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craigy1881 79 Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 well it makes perfect sense, not entirely sure we need him to be honest for division 2 when we have Mohsni, Perry, Cibari, Faure, Gasparotto who can all play there. I am leaving big lee off that list . 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,961 Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 I think we're in a bit of a catch 22. We need to move on players but we can't play any more trialists so have to keep the fringe guys (Cribari, Argyriou, Hutton and Perry) in case of emergencies. Problem is that means we'll have minimal time to move them on so pay-offs look more likely than payments. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stefanovitch 0 Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 Craigy1881 said: well it makes perfect sense, not entirely sure we need him to be honest for division 2 when we have Mohsni, Perry, Cibari, Faure, Gasparotto who can all play there. I am leaving big lee off that list . If Pandza is fully fit then I'd rather have him in the squad than Cribari or Perry to be honest. Faure however has a decent pedigree and if given a run at centre half I think he could do well. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted August 1, 2013 Author Share Posted August 1, 2013 They have just given Cole a new deal, Perry should have been away long ago, never a Rangers player. To sign Smith is just throwing money away, and we now have Foster, Mitchell, McAusland, Argy, Faure and Cole all who can play right back. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,961 Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 The Cole contract is a strange one. They must feel there's a player there so are giving him one last chance to show it. Smith I understand as we have minimal left back cover but the Foster signing wasn't required. One or the other should have been enough. I do wonder if Black and Shiels will remain at the club much longer as well. We may be able to get a fee for them should they be surplus to requirements. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted August 1, 2013 Author Share Posted August 1, 2013 Frankie said: The Cole contract is a strange one. They must feel there's a player there so are giving him one last chance to show it. Smith I understand as we have minimal left back cover but the Foster signing wasn't required. One or the other should have been enough. I do wonder if Black and Shiels will remain at the club much longer as well. We may be able to get a fee for them should they be surplus to requirements. There seems to be no planning where spending money is concerned. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Davison 0 Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 Glad that Pandza is unlikely to come. His injury record indicates that he would have been a risk. Glad, too, that some control on the playing budget is in place. However I am confused that we have two trialists at Murray Park, if there is no money to sign them. Again, why are we looking for a new backup goalkeeper? Presumably, the same budget restraints were in place when Ally had Kenny Miller in his sights? Does Ally now regret extending Cole's contract and/or signing average players in Foster and Smith. Going to sign off now and dip into confused.com 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darthter 542 Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 Tom Davison said: Glad that Pandza is unlikely to come. His injury record indicates that he would have been a risk. Glad, too, that some control on the playing budget is in place. However I am confused that we have two trialists at Murray Park, if there is no money to sign them. Again, why are we looking for a new backup goalkeeper? Presumably, the same budget restraints were in place when Ally had Kenny Miller in his sights? Does Ally now regret extending Cole's contract and/or signing average players in Foster and Smith.Going to sign off now and dip into confused.com Possibly depends on wage demands.... In order to meet Pandza's wage, they may have needed to free up some extra. The 2 trialists may require considerably less money.... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.