Jump to content

 

 

RFC Conclusion of Independent Review


Recommended Posts

As I always suspected, Whyte is delusional.

 

not really whyte is not claiming he is currently involved.

 

hes claiming he was conned out of a deal to get us back. he was.

 

whether he was illegally is all that remains to be seen and how much it costs green if he was.

Link to post
Share on other sites

not really whyte is not claiming he is currently involved.

 

hes claiming he was conned out of a deal to get us back. he was.

 

whether he was illegally is all that remains to be seen and how much it costs green if he was.

I love that he was conned personally.
Link to post
Share on other sites

from GS

english is right we as fans deserve to know what went on.

 

No he's not. We, the fans, have asked the board to get their act together and stop the leaks. Give us statements that report the situation in as clear and calm a manner as is necessary. English has given us this line of guff before where he says that the fans are entitled to know what is going on when all the while he just wants at the information to write a piece that stirs everything up. He is no more trustworthy for us than Jackson or Spiers. The board have issued a statement that covers the situation . It must burn English that they won't give him any more. Hopefully that's all the sieve at the SFA get as well.

Edited by barca72
Link to post
Share on other sites

So English wants Rangers to publish what their defence will be, if Whyte actually ever does go to court?

 

Yes. Ruin our defence line all in the name of 'transparency'. Nevermind that when the rebuttal letter is sent it will be out in public anyway no doubt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

english is right we as fans deserve to know what went on.

 

Why ? The report, independently produced by a law firm and a QC, clearly states that they believe there to be no ties to the club. Why do we "deserve" to know what went on ? Sorry, but I cant agree. Sometimes what we SHOULD do is take the word of the independent report.

 

It is like transfers... we demand we should know what is happening with transfers and then complain when they are in the public domain before people sign.

 

In this instance, it should be sufficient enough for us to accept the word of the independent parties that investigated and produced this report.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.