Darthter 542 Posted May 10, 2013 Share Posted May 10, 2013 that article also contradicts it's self when it says if whyte has a claim its only for 33%. i though he had no claim. The report states that he has no claim over the Club's assets ie. Ibrox.....at most he MAY be able to claim that he was misled about CG's takeover & therefore if successful could be awarded a damages payout. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 10, 2013 Share Posted May 10, 2013 The report states that he has no claim over the Club's assets ie. Ibrox.....at most he MAY be able to claim that he was misled about CG's takeover & therefore if successful could be awarded a damages payout. then how is green not guilty? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darthter 542 Posted May 10, 2013 Share Posted May 10, 2013 If true I really think he should be asked back. Guilty or not....I can't see CG returning to his previous role. While I think he did a good job, his mouth was starting to become a liability. He has done his job, now time for someone else to take over for the long term. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 10, 2013 Share Posted May 10, 2013 hes also seeking to sell his shares and went of his own accord. it's fairly safe to assume he wanted out. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darthter 542 Posted May 10, 2013 Share Posted May 10, 2013 then how is green not guilty? he could be deemed "not guilty" of having an active involvement with CW. The main thrust of the investigation was to clarify of CW was firstly still involved in any way with the club or the actual purchase of the assets. To be found "not guilty" CG would need to prove 100% that CW had/has no involvement whatsoever with Sevco Scotland or the actual purchasing of the assets. I think a lot of it actually comes down to the official documentation between CG & Duff & Phelps....documentation which isn't available to the public. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 10, 2013 Share Posted May 10, 2013 he could be deemed "not guilty" of having an active involvement with CW. The main thrust of the investigation was to clarify of CW was firstly still involved in any way with the club or the actual purchase of the assets. To be found "not guilty" CG would need to prove 100% that CW had/has no involvement whatsoever with Sevco Scotland or the actual purchasing of the assets. I think a lot of it actually comes down to the official documentation between CG & Duff & Phelps....documentation which isn't available to the public. i doubt they are still involved. if they were green would have paid out. his prior involvement makes him guilty. let's not forget if we got a cva we would now be owned by whyte thanks to charles. d@p, green and whyte all though we were going to get a cva as well. it's ironic but hmrc may emerge from this as having saved us. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calgacus 8 Posted May 10, 2013 Share Posted May 10, 2013 I've often wondered if there was ever any real chance of a CVA. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 10, 2013 Share Posted May 10, 2013 I've often wondered if there was ever any real chance of a CVA. zero with whyte involved. hmrc would block that all day long. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,724 Posted May 10, 2013 Share Posted May 10, 2013 zero with whyte involved. hmrc would block that all day long. Maybe we should not forget HMRC's sad involvement in all of this either. Essentially blackmailing the club, making it unsellable and inviting crooks like Whyte into the frame in the first place. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 10, 2013 Share Posted May 10, 2013 Maybe we should not forget HMRC's sad involvement in all of this either. Essentially blackmailing the club, making it unsellable and inviting crooks like Whyte into the frame in the first place. then rescuing us from returning to his control. hard to know how to feel about them. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.