Jump to content

 

 

Rebel SFL1 clubs seek vote of no confidence in board


Recommended Posts

By ANDREW SMITH AND MOIRA GORDON

Published on 05/05/2013 00:00

 

 

 

REBEL First Division clubs are considering proposing a vote of no confidence in the Scottish Football Leagueâ??s board of management.

 

 

 

Eight First Division clubs plus Second Division champions Queen of the South have already indicated their intention to resign from the SFL.

 

They would be joined by Dundee if the Dens Park club is relegated from the Scottish Premier League and the ten would then attempt to form a second-tier SPL.

 

However, such is the level of their dissatisfaction, the dissident clubs want to oust the SFL hierarchy. The board of management is led by president Jim Ballantyne (Airdrie United), vice-president Ewen Cameron (Alloa Athletic) and chief executive David Longmuir.

 

The disaffected clubs are understood to be frustrated at the slow place of change as they seek a shake-up of league football and more equitable distribution of monies.

 

Scottish Premier League clubs will meet on Tuesday and are expected to welcome the First Division renegades into the fold as they attempt to keep plans for league reconstruction moving forward. But the SPL will not be extending an invitation to Rangers to join their ranks, according to one senior source

 

The breakaway is likely to go ahead, provided play-offs are agreed as a 
primary part of the two-tier rejig. And, with Ross County expected to vote in favour of play-offs, the required 11-1 majority is expected.

 

Longmuir has questioned the wisdom of the proposed breakaway, branding it â??desperateâ?, and has made it clear that his organisation is unlikely to allow clubs to quit without a fight.

 

He insists that the move would see the renegades lose out on the 
£1.8 million annual settlement which is paid by the SPL to the SFL sides and he questioned whether there would be a financial benefit in quitting the SFL, where they also get a share of Rangersâ?? TV monies and League Cup takings.

 

But one SPL insider believes the breakaway will happen â?? provided play-offs are part of the deal.

 

â??At the very least this has been a shot across the bows of the SFL and shows how strongly people want to push through some form of reconstruction in time for next year,â? said the source. â??We have all spent a lot of time trying to find the a suitable consensus and I donâ??t think the desire was there to wait another year.

 

â??The play-offs would create more interest and more meaningful games. One of the proposals would see the top four clubs in the new First Division involved and that is attractive to everyone, including SPL clubs because everyone knows that if they go down, then there is a greater chance to come back up at the earliest opportunity.

 

â??But I donâ??t see Rangers being invited to join us. I know it would probably give us a more attractive commercial package but I donâ??t see people voting in favour of that.â?

 

The previous proposal of 12-12-18 fell at the first hurdle when Ross County and St Mirren voted against and, if the latest suggestion is to include changes in the distribution of wealth, another 11-1 majority will be required.

 

â??But this time, I would be more hopeful of it going through because Ross County have made it clear they look favourably on play-offs being introduced so, if that was part of the package, and I think we would all want that to be the case, then that would be a shift in votes,â? the insider said.

 

â??Reading the papers, it would seem that Stewart Gilmour also wants play-offs so he might change his vote as well.â?

 

While stating that the feeling is that any league restructuring would ideally involve all professional clubs, one compromise that has been mooted is the staggering of that, with the willing parties jumping ship this summer and the rest being brought under the same umbrella a year later.

 

â??Clubs are struggling and want to find a way of staying full-time and those that donâ??t want to be part of that, thatâ??s fine, but we canâ??t let them hold everyone else back.â?

 

http://www.scotsman.com/sport/football/sfl-division-one/rebel-sfl1-clubs-seek-vote-of-no-confidence-in-board-1-2920705

Link to post
Share on other sites

A lot to pick out the article but this stood out.

 

The disaffected clubs are understood to be frustrated at the slow place of change as they seek a shake-up of league football and more equitable distribution of monies

 

Frustrated yet it was 2 of the SPL clubs who stopped the proposal that was on the table. And playing Rangers 4 times in 1 season will give them more wealth than any TV deal.

 

This could get really messy.

 

Will be interesting to see what happens with Hearts once the season is over.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is something very suspicious about all this: not only are the SFL being blamed when the SPL voted against it but where the hell is the money coming from? They would lose money out of this, not gain. There's a stictch-up underpinning this - but what? They have our TV money already

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's get this right.

Smith is saying that these clubs want to resign from the SFL but they also want to oust the board. Would this be before they resign or after? Does Smith take his readers for muppets?

Just a thought, but is this anything to with Pete the Jap's takeover of Scottish football? If he gets another 12 onside, he's got a pretty hefty argument that he speaks for 24 professional teams ie Scottish football.

Like many, I just don't see the angle here. But I bet that Regan, Doncaster and Pete the Jap know.

Gribz, I totally agree, and think we're in for a pretty messy summer. Actually very messy.

 

EDIT: this move will also give the SPL more turnover. They will be the big boys of Scottish football. It will be a takeover.

Edited by bluebear54
Link to post
Share on other sites

English king wants a foothold in Scotland. Scottish lairds are squabbling over their next king and can't find a solution that ain't messy and bloody. English king throws meaningless baronies and some silver coins to some Scottish lairds. The latter crawl over one another to be first for that, hoping that there's much more. English king gets foothold in Scotland, Scots remain without a king and a happily divided lords' council. Mission accomplished ... for the English king.

 

Substitute with SPL, rebel SFL clubs, Scum FC, etc. at your leisure.

 

NB: If anything, the Scottish SFL clubs should have learned from the failure that is "this season's SPL". How on Earth they come to the conclusion that the SPL or SPL 2 will be a thriving thing is beyond me. If they had any sense at all, they would know that the Blue Pound is coming their way soon enough, keeping them afloat and happy for the next half-decade. Rather than some mighty-be deals with the failure that is the SPL ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.