rbr 1,255 Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 ill always remember murray as the man who had 25 mill to buy the club but couldnt raise a brass button when it came to the wire. Different Murray mate 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,660 Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 I would like to know who told the DR about this, that "source close to the club". As for the story itself, Murray was a non-entity before he became chairman, and I hardly know what he did since becoming chairman. That is not saying a lot, but "winning over the fans" was IMHO hardly any (public) work of Murray. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darthter 542 Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 If I recall correctly, when Malcom Murray was first appointed, CG made a point of saying that Murray had the power to fire CG. If that is true, MM is higher up the tree, and therefore it's not right that CG should be demanding that he goes. As with all media "stories" I will take this with a pinch of salt until any concrete evidence/quotes etc come to light. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 I will await the JT reply on the Rangers website a very good chance this is the jt version. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 If I recall correctly, when Malcom Murray was first appointed, CG made a point of saying that Murray had the power to fire CG. If that is true, MM is higher up the tree, and therefore it's not right that CG should be demanding that he goes. As with all media "stories" I will take this with a pinch of salt until any concrete evidence/quotes etc come to light. murray cant sack charles. the board maybe could but thats debatable. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trueblue 64 57 Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 This rumor has been around for a few months now, i do not see anything in this story that now makes it true. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 people on ff seem pretty sure murray sits in bar72 and not the directors box. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,463 Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 I'd much rather have differences of opinion in the boardroom than not. Not having these previously may have contributed to the problems the club faced previously. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 I'd much rather have differences of opinion in the boardroom than not. Not having these previously may have contributed to the problems the club faced previously. yes but any showdown leading to the protagonist being ousted is whyte esq. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,463 Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 yes but any showdown leading to the protagonist being ousted is whyte esq. Perhaps, but if there is any Whyte-esque drama to this disagreement then Murray should be saying so publicly. The fact he isn't suggests there's nothing unreasonable going on. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.