kuznetsov 0 Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 Rangers Supporters@rangersfctrustAppears the Asian investment company are looking a fast return: Orlit were the firm that introduced Arif Navqi of Abraaj Capitail panicking after recent results? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComeOffit 0 Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 (edited) Even if the cash helped keep the club running? He said not 3 weeks ago we had zero external debt. This is a "debt" from 6/7 months ago. Did he just forget about it? Is it not external? It doesn't matter what the money was used for. He lied about us having a debt. I told you when he took over that they didn't have a pot to piss in. This just proves it. He basically bought the club with the help of a private company loaning him money and finding investors. How is that different from what whyte done with ticketus? Maybe on a smaller scale, but who else does he owe? Can he be trusted? I'm sure some people think he has a wide network of buddies that he found to invest in us. This proves that any wide boy off the street could have done it. The difficult part was getting to the top of D&P's wish list. How did he do that? He still to this day hasn't invested a single penny of his own money. Neither has ahmad. All they have done is take, and organise a private company to find investors. Close on £3m for that? Really? Should be wearing a fucking mask. Edited February 6, 2013 by ComeOffit 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 th emoney used to buy the club was also a loan, was it not? did anyone use their own cash and who are all these creditors? For the CVA, no indication the 5.5 million was. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 He said not 3 weeks ago we had zero external debt. This is a "debt" from 6/7 months ago. Did he just forget about it? Is it not external? It doesn't matter what the money was used for. He lied about us having a debt. I told you when he took over that they didn't have a pot to piss in. This just proves it. He basically bought the club with the help of a private company loaning him money and finding investors. How is that different from what whyte done with ticketus? Maybe on a smaller scale, but who else does he owe? Can he be trusted? I'm sure he people think he has a wide network of buddies that he found to invest in us. This proves that any wide boy off the street could have done it. The difficult part was getting to the top of D&P's wish list. How did he do that? He still to this hasn't invested a single penny of his own money. Neither has ahmad. All they have done is take, and organise a private company to find investors. Close on £3m for that? Really? Should be wearing a fucking mask. Share issue? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 i thought their offer was the best one for the club but they were double crossed by whyte and d&p. certainly easier to trust people we know. The best for the club was not the first agenda, never is in an administration. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,114 Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 For the CVA, no indication the 5.5 million was. No confirmation it wasn't either, is there? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 I can't remember, I do remember TBK never put in an unconditional offer and insisted it was a CVA or nothing. That is why it was a non-starter. greens cva had a ream of conditions a mile long including an 8.5 million quid loan to be repaid by 2020 with interest. thanks for pointing out another of d@p lies. anyway seeing as how you forget heres d@p own words on it The administrators eventually responded to Murray and Kennedy with a statement in which Whitehouse said: â??It is most unusual for us to comment publicly on individual bids but due to the allegations made by Mr Kennedy and Mr Murray today with the regard to our conduct as administrators we feel compelled to reveal important facts in relation to the various Blue Knights attempts to buy the Club. â??The fundamental reason we could not proceed with the Blue Knights/Ticketus combination was that we were advised there was not agreement within the consortium in relation to the funding of their bid. â??Throughout the process Mr Kennedy told us repeatedly he would be the â??last man standingâ??. As Mr Kennedy today made a virtue of explaining publicly details of his bid we are in a position to comment on those remarks. â??Of the £5.5 million cash on â??day oneâ?? figure Mr Kennedy quoted, £3.5 million of that would be provided by us in any case from the Clubâ??s debtors. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 No confirmation it wasn't either, is there? but some evidence it probably was. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 No confirmation it wasn't either, is there? The prospectus indicates it, 1.85 million loans you said? And that can be about the cash to help keep us running without season ticket money. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kuznetsov 0 Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 The best for the club was not the first agenda, never is in an administration. they claim d&p agreed to sell them the club, which i believe, then green appeared afterwards. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.