Guest nvager Posted February 2, 2013 Share Posted February 2, 2013 No high marks today. (Marks out of 10) Alexander - 5 Faure - 3 Perry - 2 Cribari - 2 Wallace - 3 Little - 3 Black - 2 Hutton - 5 Shiels - 2 Templeton - 2 Sandaza - 2 Hegarty - 3 Naismith - 2 McKay - 2 Management Team - 2 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gribz 919 Posted February 2, 2013 Share Posted February 2, 2013 Is that minus's??? Alexander is an international goalkeeper and should be communicating better. 3's are generous for me 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kuznetsov 0 Posted February 2, 2013 Share Posted February 2, 2013 a 1 for everyone. a shameful display which should signal the end of a few rangers careers. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 2, 2013 Share Posted February 2, 2013 i would give walace and hutton about a 5. the rest could share a point between them 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aftershock 0 Posted February 2, 2013 Share Posted February 2, 2013 Was Shiels playing?.....Totally anonymous today. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Moon 1,370 Posted February 2, 2013 Share Posted February 2, 2013 Was Shiels playing?.....Totally anonymous today. I've been saying that for weeks. I cannot understand why he is keeping his place in the team 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 2, 2013 Share Posted February 2, 2013 shiels wasnt really the problem. the problem is sandaza is also a number ten and the service to both of them was abysmal. the players further back need to be brave for a number ten to be able to get on the ball and influence play. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waltersgotstyle 307 Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 I completely disagree GS, Shiels looked to be hiding all game, we really missed Lee 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,834 Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 On a sidenote, a year and a half ago, you all would have probably only had one of the players starting yesterday in the first team line-up, Wallace. The rest would either be reserves or SPL-average standard (including Templeton and Sandaza, if you cast your mind to some of the comments back then) or, when it comes to the youngsters, not even on our radar. To suddenly match them alongside better Rangers teams of the past (who also lost to DU et al) and slag them off like there is no tomorrow is really stretching it. Likewise is the cry for them to "playing for the jersey" or calling them a "disgrace for Rangers". Have we all descended into the simpleton mode of your common football fan? Make no mistake here. We should not accept bad performances from any Rangers team - and no-one does. But we should neither forget to check reality every now and then. We all have seen better Rangers teams getting beaten by worse teams, as well as woefully playing Rangers teams conquer better opponents. The world always continued to rotate. As it does today. The Arabs will enjoy their short lived success, only to realize that they are still also rans in a league of one. It was their best opportunity to get one over us and they did - IMHO more with luck than ability. We though should look at ourselves on here and ask ourselves whether we actually look reasonably at things. For a lot of poison has been spilled over Gersnet these last few months and despite emotions running high at times, we should not follow this path for much longer. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kuznetsov 0 Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 probably best not to tell people what to think and how to act. rangers fans are well within their rights be disgusted with the current situation at ibrox and if they want to vent their fury and anger then they can. harping back to crap comparisons from the past is the weakest of arguments. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.