ian1964 10,831 Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 Depends what rule book he is reading!, rev 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9..........................................................?,does he have an up to date revision?,it changes that many times does it not? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 4,018 Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 Long enough for an HMRC appeal to be lodged? Think u mean long enough to see if HMRC get the right to appeal..............which will affect their judgement IMO. When you select the jury & pay the jury there's only one outcome. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darthter 542 Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 There's a possibility that a decision HAS been made....it's just Lord Nimmo hasn't been told what it is yet (just to keep up the "independent" charade...) 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,831 Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 Low level paper gatherer(s)? Indeed, Mr McKenzie by Shane Nicholson | CRO Executive Editor So was Harper Macleod’s Rod McKenzie in fact a “low level paper gatherer,” or was he directing an army of such folks to do his and his bosses’ (handlers’) dirty work? Signs, as you might imagine, point to the latter. Word has it the worker bees at HM spent time mulling over every single contract for every Rangers player since the 1980s, scrutinizing every last little detail, looking for anything that could drive the knife into our back. Little bit different story than we've heard so far, isn't it? No, folks, Rod was not slaving under candlelight, picking through boxes of documents and stacks of paperwork last fall. He had a whole army of summer students and trainees to do his “paper gathering,” tasked to find the smallest bit of minutiae in any contract of any Rangers employee all the way back to the time of Souness to layeth the hammer down, and all for what? To strip titles his precious bhoys in green couldn’t win from us on the pitch. Roddy, mate, your little fantasy land is crumbling around you. Your sure thing — a guilty verdict in the HMRC case — just disappeared before your eyes. How quickly was Peter on the phone that day, making sure you knew just how important it was to bury us in the LNS hearing? Is it you who will foot the bill if and when this ends up in a court of session? It’d be an awful shame for your friends at the SFA and SPL — not to mention your close mates on the other side of town — if UEFA and FIFA took a keen interest in this sordid affair again. I hear they don’t take too kindly to such matters finding their way to outside jurisdiction. Maybe you should’ve made your wee deferment an indefinite proposition. http://www.thecoplandroad.org/2013/01/low-level-paper-gatherers-indeed-mr.html 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 Depends what rule book he is reading!, rev 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9..........................................................?,does he have an up to date revision?,it changes that many times does it not? one thing is ofr sure he will be reading the one written by celtcs lawyers. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,831 Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 one thing is ofr sure he will be reading the one written by celtcs lawyers. The sole purpose for this charade! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 The honourable Lord Nimmo Smith? nothing honourable about him. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,511 Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 The honourable Lord Nimmo Smith? nothing honourable about him. Just to clear one thing up about him he had totally nothing to do with the illegal transfer ban. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 (edited) Just to clear one thing up about him he had totally nothing to do with the illegal transfer ban. From sky news on17th Agust Lord Nimmo Smith - was appointed by the SFA in February, days after Rangers were forced to call in the administrators. The findings of the independent inquiry resulted in then owner Craig Whyte being deemed not "a fit and proper person" to run a football club. Rangers also faced a charge of bringing the game into disrepute on four counts. Following a hearing, the SFA's judicial panel imposed a 12-month transfer embargo on the Glasgow giants, which comes into effect next month. He does have a wee bit of history between the SFA, .SPL and us, he's their first judge to go to when they want a decision made to go against us, funny that. Edit, he was right about Whyte though, but that horse had already bolted from the stable, just a wee bit to late for Rangers benefit, funny that again though Edited February 1, 2013 by aweebluesoandso 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UCF2008 0 Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 Holding off to see if HMRC are granted an appeal 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.