ComeOffit 0 Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Yeah, ok... Aye, very good batman. That's what he said after the cva failed. Before that he said something along the lines of " why would Dave King want a cva to fail, and not keep all Rangers history". Search for it on youtube if you can stomach the tarrier pish that accompanies the video. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Aye, very good batman. That's what he said after the cva failed. Before that he said something along the lines of " why would Dave King want a cva to fail, and not keep all Rangers history". Search for it on youtube if you can stomach the tarrier pish that accompanies the video. If i remember right he said the CVA kept history, never said a new company didn't. But carry on. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComeOffit 0 Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 If i remember right he said the CVA kept history, never said a new company didn't. But carry on. lol . 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComeOffit 0 Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 i disagree on greens interest in titles. his interest is twofold. he needs to keep the punters rolling through the turn-styles and their is value in owning the worlds most successful club. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComeOffit 0 Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 i disagree on greens interest in titles. his interest is twofold. he needs to keep the punters rolling through the turn-styles and their is value in owning the worlds most successful club. Aye, your first point is valid, but he doesn't actually "own" the club, and isn't dependent on a re-sale value to make his money. Maybe to keep the share price high, but he isn't the owner. We dont have an owner, apparently. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Aye, your first point is valid, but he doesn't actually "own" the club, and isn't dependent on a re-sale value to make his money. Maybe to keep the share price high, but he isn't the owner. We dont have an owner, apparently. he owns the biggest chunk anyone does. so he has more to gain or loose than anyone. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComeOffit 0 Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 he owns the biggest chunk anyone does. so he has more to gain or loose than anyone. Do you think the share price will take a massive hit, depending on whether we keep historic titles or not? I have my doubts. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 The share prospectus outlines that the titles will be defended. I would suggest giving him a chance but of course you won't. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComeOffit 0 Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 The share prospectus outlines that the titles will be defended. I would suggest giving him a chance but of course you won't. Why would I give someone that said our history is "swept aside", a chance? Or did you just ignore the video I posted because it doesn't fit with your agenda? You don't have to lie on greens behalf, he's quite capable of doing it on his own. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.