RFFF statement

[craig 5,199]

I'm not sure how you could come to that conclusion based on what I said. especially my op.

 

perhaps I have been dragged of topic if so I appologise.

 

No need to apologise GS. I just thought that you were having a go at Green rather than where any issue should have been aimed, RFFF. If I am mistaken then it is ME that owes you an apology

[the gunslinger 3,366]

No need to apologise GS. I just thought that you were having a go at Green rather than where any issue should have been aimed, RFFF. If I am mistaken then it is ME that owes you an apology

 

I find its best not to chase apologies. it saves me typing dozens a day in return.

[ComeOffit 0]

Green couldn't give two fucks about our old titles, so I'd imagine that the less he has to spend on them the better, from his point of view. They don't have a re-sale value, and it's not if he is the sole owner of the club who will lose out if we happen to lose them. Always annoys me when he harps on about "buying our old titles". You can't buy titles. You can become the owner of the trophies etc, but it doesn't mean you own the titles. The titles belong to the players and management that won them, not some fly by night that's been here two minutes.

 

I'm probably alone in this, but I think the RFFF money would be put to better use by paying some of the oldco's small creditors, or maybe even compensating the old shareholders. Let green pay for the defence of "his" titles if he is so passionate about it. The last I heard, green wasn't even going to the meetings to try and defend our position re title stripping. His most recent defence was "it's fuck all to do with me".

[craig 5,199]

Green couldn't give two fucks about our old titles, so I'd imagine that the less he has to spend on them the better, from his point of view. They don't have a re-sale value, and it's not if he is the sole owner of the club who will lose out if we happen to lose them. Always annoys me when he harps on about "buying our old titles". You can't buy titles. You can become the owner of the trophies etc, but it doesn't mean you own the titles. The titles belong to the players and management that won them, not some fly by night that's been here two minutes.

 

I'm probably alone in this, but I think the RFFF money would be put to better use by paying some of the oldco's small creditors, or maybe even compensating the old shareholders. Let green pay for the defence of "his" titles if he is so passionate about it. The last I heard, green wasn't even going to the meetings to try and defend our position re title stripping. His most recent defence was "it's fuck all to do with me".

 

I dont think that is strictly true though is it ? Was his defence not more like "It is a kamgaroo court based on bullshit and we see no reason to entertain them" ?

 

Of course, both sides can dress it up however they like.

[simplythebest 0]

I should know better than to hope people might have disappeared.

[ComeOffit 0]

I dont think that is strictly true though is it ? Was his defence not more like "It is a kamgaroo court based on bullshit and we see no reason to entertain them" ?

 

Of course, both sides can dress it up however they like.

 

He did mention something about kangaroo's, yes, but I think his main argument was that it is oldco business. He doesn't make too much sense when it comes to oldco and newco affairs. His moaning about paying oldco football debts is a perfect example of his confusion. We can't really claim all our history, but in the same breath write off all our historic football debts. I know he paid them, but with a heavy heart.

[craig 5,199]

He did mention something about kangeroo's, yes, but I think his main argument was that it is oldco business. He doesn't make too much sense when it comes to oldco and newco affairs. His moaning about paying oldco football debts is a perfect example of his confusion. We can't really claim all our history, but in the same breath write off all our historic football debts. I know he paid them, but with a heavy heart.

 

I do agree on that one. It certainly seemed at odds with itself in suggesting oldco debts were not his burden of responsibility at the same time as saying that we were keeping all our history. Had me concerned on how others would react to it, that is for sure.

[ComeOffit 0]

Let's not forget he is the same man that said without a cva our history was all but gone. He's a liability in this battle against title stripping.

[simplythebest 0]

I do agree on that one. It certainly seemed at odds with itself in suggesting oldco debts were not his burden of responsibility at the same time as saying that we were keeping all our history. Had me concerned on how others would react to it, that is for sure.

 

Well personally I think at least from a moral point of view Whyte should have had to pay them. No way of ever making that happen of course.

[simplythebest 0]

Let's not forget he is the same man that said without a cva our history was all but gone. He's a liability in this battle against title stripping.

 

"I think everyone knows that it's Rangers that are playing at Ibrox whether its owned by company A or company B.

 

"Our main rivals - or our former main rivals - across the city they have had three different companies in their lifespan.

 

"In fact if you look at their corporate structure now it's more complicated than Rangers' is.

 

"So it's not about an individual or a corporate company with a registration number. This is Rangers and will always be Rangers."

 

Yeah, ok...