simplythebest 0 Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 and yet charlies not paying for the fight for either reason Or the RFFF have decided they want to fund this, and make some good fighting use of the money gathering dust. This place is hard work sometimes.... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,114 Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 Up to them isn't it, the title stripping is the main concern right now, we should be united on it (clearly we aren't of course). Are we not? Just who is saying we shouldn't defend any attempt to strip our titles? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 Or the RFFF have decided they want to fund this, and make some good fighting use of the money gathering dust. This place is hard work sometimes.... an easy life is boring. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GovanAllan 0 Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 Well considering they charged all 3 entities, why should the newco pick up the torch and leave itself open to fines? Of course it's easy to have a pop at Green which like an easy life is getting very boring. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 because green said they would? to protect their investment? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Are we not? Just who is saying we shouldn't defend any attempt to strip our titles? No but here we are debating over a source of funding for the defence. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,114 Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 No but here we are debating over a source of funding for the defence. A rather distinct difference, no? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 A rather distinct difference, no? Not really, frankly I don't think it should matter. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 ultimately it doesnt matter who pays for the defense, just that it happens. views will vary on the best way to spend rfff money. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 ultimately it doesnt matter who pays for the defense, just that it happens. views will vary on the best way to spend rfff money. Well your alternative was charity, as much as i'm all for charity it hardly constitutes a fighting fund. If it's not going to be used to help Rangers I would prefer it be handed back, and there's certainly no point keeping it forever on the off chance of another insolvency event. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.