simplythebest 0 Posted December 1, 2012 Share Posted December 1, 2012 how can it be demonised its this month and we still dont know a thing about it. Coming from the one who declared he'd not be investing on the day the intention was announced. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted December 1, 2012 Share Posted December 1, 2012 Coming from the one who declared he'd not be investing on the day the intention was announced. mate i dont have a penny to my name. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted December 1, 2012 Share Posted December 1, 2012 mate i dont have a penny to my name. You made it sound like it was because of Charles. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted December 1, 2012 Share Posted December 1, 2012 You made it sound like it was because of Charles. i don't think i did. did i not say that it was up to the individual but i couldn't invest. though i don't think i would if i could afford it. for example i wouldn't have anything to do with a scheme that involved a dividend and money leeching out the club. i know for a fact i've said it sounds like a good investment if what we saw in the leaked presentation was true. but if that was correct i wouldn't touch it because of the dividend. two main issues for me right now. is the money for the purchase coming out of club funds? will a dividend be paid. i cant stress how strongly i would be against either senario and i hope we get clarity in the prospectus. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,884 Posted December 2, 2012 Share Posted December 2, 2012 Yes it's quite bizarre you ask a question and when it's answered factually you automatically conclude it's an attack on Green. So show me the basis in law for Green or anybody else for that matter being able to limit someones stake in a publicly quoted company to 15% ditto for the AIM rule enabling him to do likewise. That is not what I was stating. Nor was I slagging you off. I was just wondering about who knows the answers when it goes con-Green (a slight difference to anti-Green). And, btw, this is no pro-Green remark. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.