Bears 0 Posted November 20, 2012 Share Posted November 20, 2012 A, I right I. Saying that the American Bill Millars idea was a tautly. Perfect I. Hindsight? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueMazza 0 Posted November 20, 2012 Share Posted November 20, 2012 I think I know what one it will be! They'll go aggressive and against players. They'll attempt to find ex-Rangers players who are affected by this and use them for interviews on how they 'were misled by the club, how disappointed they are and how after their loyal service this is a big slap in the face.' Plus tonnes of dirty 'secrets' no doubt and how Rangers is really a hateful club BLAH FUCKING BLAH. I bet they are trawling around already. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GovanAllan 0 Posted November 20, 2012 Share Posted November 20, 2012 Surely the SPL can't claim we were paying dual contracts when the court has stated all payments were loans? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueMazza 0 Posted November 20, 2012 Share Posted November 20, 2012 Surely the SPL can't claim we were paying dual contracts when the court has stated all payments were loans? No they can't. But they will try to claim Rangers deliberately concealed the paperwork from them which goes against their rules, giving them options to punish us. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GovanAllan 0 Posted November 20, 2012 Share Posted November 20, 2012 No they can't. But they will try to claim Rangers deliberately concealed the paperwork from them which goes against their rules, giving them options to punish us. Would be a fine then, they can't strip titles. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueMazza 0 Posted November 20, 2012 Share Posted November 20, 2012 Would be a fine then, they can't strip titles. That's what I'm thinking. What would be the precedent for stripping titles? there isn't any. It would be a completely overblown punishment. Especially since it appears that it doesn't apply to all players. What if a player only played once? Does that count towards taking a title? Complete nonsense. Fine & maybe another registration embargo? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RabiDuck 89 Posted November 20, 2012 Share Posted November 20, 2012 Rule change imminent, backdated obviously, to allow SPL to strip trophies? I'm sure PL is working on the details right now! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gers4Life 0 Posted November 20, 2012 Share Posted November 20, 2012 As jolly boy John would say "for REAL!! Well thank fuck that's over oh did we win btw 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ergatrude 0 Posted November 20, 2012 Share Posted November 20, 2012 I might actually watch the Celtic game tonight. Never watched them before except vs. The Rangers, but watching them lose will put the icing on a sweet tasting cake. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real PapaBear 0 Posted November 20, 2012 Share Posted November 20, 2012 Rangers debt used to be in the order of £80m. Murray reduced it to round about £20m. This amount of debt is manageable for a club like Rangers - so why did Murray sell to Whyte and why was nobody else interested in buying? Because we and everybody else had been told that the Big Tax Case was a foregone conclusion and that Rangers would end up owing HMRC £95m. Murray got cold feet, knowing that he couldn't possibly come up with £95m, he panicked and chucked away the club like a hot potato. Turns out that wasn't true and there was no need to sell to Whyte after all. So Whyte bought us and ran us into the ground and put the company that ran the club for 113 years into liquidation. Have I missed anything here? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.