the gunslinger 3,366 Posted November 19, 2012 Share Posted November 19, 2012 you see their is your answer. top class ceo and owner puting cash in. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted November 19, 2012 Share Posted November 19, 2012 you see their is your answer. top class ceo and owner puting cash in. A top class CEO and an owner or owners not taking cash OUT would do fine. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted November 19, 2012 Share Posted November 19, 2012 indeed it would. while its great for an owner to put cash in its not a necessity. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted November 19, 2012 Share Posted November 19, 2012 A top class CEO and an owner or owners not taking cash OUT would do fine. What is wrong with rewards through share value? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted November 19, 2012 Share Posted November 19, 2012 What is wrong with rewards through share value? nothing what so ever and if thats greens plan then good luck to him. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted November 19, 2012 Share Posted November 19, 2012 What is wrong with rewards through share value? Nothing, but I wasn't referring to anyone making some money from their shares increasing in value. While you mention it though, let's be realistic about this notion of RFC share values magically increasing in any significant way: I won't say it won't happen because you never know, but I certainly wouldn't bet on it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
amms 0 Posted November 19, 2012 Share Posted November 19, 2012 What is wrong with rewards through share value? Because success for Rangers should always be judged by what's in the trophy cabinet not the vagaries of the square mile. In my opinion we shouldn't be an attractive investment vehicle for hedge fund managers. If your goal is to raise the share value then you make decisions based on achieving that. Those decisions might not always be in the best interest of the support though. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted November 19, 2012 Share Posted November 19, 2012 nothing what so ever and if thats greens plan then good luck to him. Well that's what he's always said, and that income always goes into the club. Although if you assume he's lying it's a bit hard to prove, maybe the prospectus will confirm it once and for all. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted November 19, 2012 Share Posted November 19, 2012 Because success for Rangers should always be judged by what's in the trophy cabinet not the vagaries of the square mile. In my opinion we shouldn't be an attractive investment vehicle for hedge fund managers. If your goal is to raise the share value then you make decisions based on achieving that. Those decisions might not always be in the best interest of the support though. Not really, the share values can only really rise if the club progresses on the park. It's a fantasy world where there isn't a business element to football, and let's remember if these 'hedge fund managers' hadn't seen us as an attractive investment we might no longer have a club. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted November 19, 2012 Share Posted November 19, 2012 i don't assume hes lying but the leaked presentation seemed genuine and referenced a possible dividend. as i always say. that will be unacceptable if it transpires. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.