der Berliner 3,743 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 (edited) I just cant understand why Ally would drop Hutton and play McCulloch in midfield? First, because we apparently have told Hutton to go. Second ... to have a holding midfield player which allows Macleod, Black, and McKay to attack ... while occasionally having a go too. Third, because Ally loves to annoy the McCulloch bashers. As of you other statement ... I've been watching football since the mid-80s and have seen various tactics employed by various teams against various opposition. If you think a 4-4-2 is cool, so be it. I deem a 3-5-2 or 3-4-3 at home against a weak team decent enough, especially if it can easily turn into a 2-5-3 as well. Broadfoot was always attacking, unless I am mistaken? Can you get more offensive than that? Edited August 18, 2012 by der Berliner Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Amokachi 0 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 disappointed to see McKay dropped and the dross from last week retai.ed but its what I expected. that said it was never a pen and we romped it while playing pretty well. I thoroughly enjoyed the game. That's much more critical of Ally than I would expect from you GS? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bluenose80 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 I just cant understand why Ally would drop Hutton and play McCulloch in midfield? McCulloch's his mate Hutton isn't thats all there is to it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Amokachi 0 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 (edited) McCulloch has never been a good player in any position and the older he gets the worse it gets. He was much improved as a striker in the latter part of the season but he still only amassed 4 SPL goals all season which is pathetic. I used to think Lovenkrands was a waste of a jersey more often than not at left wing until I saw McCulloch played there. Edited August 18, 2012 by Daniel Amokachi Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CumbernauldGers 0 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 First, because we apparently have told Hutton to go. Second ... to have a holding midfield player which allows Macleaod, Black, and McKay to attack ... while occasionally having a go too. Third, because Ally loves to annoy the McCulloch bashers. McCulloch is not and never will be a holding midfield player. Hutton is. Things like backing McCulloch over Hutton shows Ally will never be a manager or coach. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 huttons less mobile than jig with a worse first touch. I wouldn't play either in midfield tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,743 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 And so we are back to that topic. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CumbernauldGers 0 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 huttons less mobile than jig with a worse first touch. I wouldn't play either in midfield tbh. I dont normally bother with your post's mate but that has to be some of the worst stuff you have come away with for a while. Hutton is not that good but to say he is slower and has a worst touch than McCulloch is not right. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CumbernauldGers 0 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 And so we are back to that topic. Do you always post cryptic stuff mate? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 We need to get the defence sorted, it has been woeful for a while. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts