der Berliner 3,882 Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 Maybe it is too early: So the SPL paid for the SFL tv rights for Rangers games to pay the SFL their 2m per annum? Again, you do wonder how much the SFL would have got in doing their own deal with regards to our tv deals, plus the income our support generates? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dutchy Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 "48 hours" Why are the still delaying our membership, right to the last minute? Things are just getting petty now, or pettier! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tannochsidebear 2,435 Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 What is being missed here is that in 3 years time when (hopefully) we are promoted back to the SPL, there will be a great demand for the SPL tv rights for that season as we go back to fighting for the title and CL participation. That alone should see a much higher value placed on the tv rights for that season onwards. What the SPL are basically doing just now is trying to get Sky to sign up to a much longer deal to try to make the next 3 years worth more than they should be if sold on their own. What that means to us is that the tv rights for when we are back in the SPL are going to be worth a lot less to us because the clubs who have been in the SPL for the previous 3 years will have been getting paid a large part of the value that WE bring to the league, during the years we are not in the league. This, yet again, benefits one club far more than it does any other. As the one club who is going to be shown much more often than the others, scum fc are trying to do a deal to ensure they get OUR share of tv money for the future years while we are out of the equation. It is yet more "punishment" that they are taking our advanced tv rights money before we get there, and throwing the SFL a few crumbs along the way. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,882 Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 You wonder what the SFL clubs think of this. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 What is being missed here is that in 3 years time when (hopefully) we are promoted back to the SPL, there will be a great demand for the SPL tv rights for that season as we go back to fighting for the title and CL participation. That alone should see a much higher value placed on the tv rights for that season onwards. What the SPL are basically doing just now is trying to get Sky to sign up to a much longer deal to try to make the next 3 years worth more than they should be if sold on their own. What that means to us is that the tv rights for when we are back in the SPL are going to be worth a lot less to us because the clubs who have been in the SPL for the previous 3 years will have been getting paid a large part of the value that WE bring to the league, during the years we are not in the league. This, yet again, benefits one club far more than it does any other. As the one club who is going to be shown much more often than the others, scum fc are trying to do a deal to ensure they get OUR share of tv money for the future years while we are out of the equation. It is yet more "punishment" that they are taking our advanced tv rights money before we get there, and throwing the SFL a few crumbs along the way. id say you have this spot on. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CumbernauldGers 0 Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 compulsive liar? Sorry but this is getting out of hand now. Do we have to look at post's like this on every thread? Anybody else fed up with constant stuff? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 Sorry but this is getting out of hand now. Do we have to look at post's like this on every thread? Anybody else fed up with constant stuff? sorry about that one. couldnt help myself. its a valid point from Frankie though. why do you think so little of what he says comes true? over optimistic? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CumbernauldGers 0 Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 sorry about that one. couldnt help myself. its a valid point from Frankie though. why do you think so little of what he says comes true? over optimistic? I dont mainly because i deal with the facts and they dont exist in your anti-Green world. Please dont respond to me again and i will do the same with you. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 well as you say each individual can judge what he says against the reality of what happens. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
biggordy 0 Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 compulsive liar? Only when his lips are moving. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.