Gers4Life 0 Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 These talks will continue into saturday at the latest and if no decision has been made then the shit is really going to hit the fan big time 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 Have to be honest, I just want us to get playing football whatever. May be a bit of a 'surrender' attitude but it's how I feel. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
foggy dewhurst 0 Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 so where are we with our application who wants what and who are the people blocking it time to name the scum . 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,834 Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 so where are we with our application who wants what and who are the people blocking it time to name the scum . The point is, no-one knows for sure. As it seems (sic!), the SPL who has our share only wants to hand it over if they get their EBT investigation at their demands (i.e. us forfeiting the right to challenge it). Green stands firm here for various reasons. The biggest ace is that without us the Scottish game will implode, while his biggest problem is (in terms of agreeing to the SPL demands) that McCoist will most likely go and take half the remaining squad along. Should the SPL continue their stance here and refuse the share-transfer before the start of the season, we should sue them for blackmail and coercion. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
foggy dewhurst 0 Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 court of session first thing in the morning 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54andcounting 0 Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 So the SPL is running football in this country? I thought that was the Scottish Football Associations job? FIFA should be kicking them up the arse. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 court of session first thing in the morning agreed this is now a scandal. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mountain Bear 0 Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 he would no question but it doesn't stop you owning a club only from being on the board of one. same for a directorship bar. You're right about being banned from holding directorships, but I think the SFA's rules allow them to block club Directors if their associates are not fit and proper, so i'm pretty sure they'd be able to find a connection between the majority shareholder and the board of his company. Anyway, it ain't gonna happen. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheWeeBlueDevil 0 Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 Nothing. The sale never went through due to the collapse of the cva. Sorry, it was a silly question that had in-fact already been answered by Forlanssister in the quote I used 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 You're right about being banned from holding directorships, but I think the SFA's rules allow them to block club Directors if their associates are not fit and proper, so i'm pretty sure they'd be able to find a connection between the majority shareholder and the board of his company. Anyway, it ain't gonna happen. your probably right. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.