Guest thebear0806 Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 Various people saying license been granted but have accepted a transfer embargo. This has upset quite a few and I can see there point , but surely it depends on the conditions of the embargo , do people think it would be OK to accept so that we can get back playing competitively. Conditions might be ,loan players allowed to be signed, players below the age of 21 can be signed, players out of contract allowed to be signed. If conditions like this were attached people would see it as a face saving exercise by the SFA , I would go along with it , would fight a total ban , but to get us playing give them a get out of jail card , the end will justify the means . 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Moon 1,389 Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 Various people saying license been granted but have accepted a transfer embargo. This has upset quite a few and I can see there point , but surely it depends on the conditions of the embargo , do people think it would be OK to accept so that we can get back playing competitively. Conditions might be ,loan players allowed to be signed, players below the age of 21 can be signed, players out of contract allowed to be signed. If conditions like this were attached people would see it as a face saving exercise by the SFA , I would go along with it , would fight a total ban , but to get us playing give them a get out of jail card , the end will justify the means . I will wait and see what the terms are. In principle I do not think we should have accepted it but always thought Green would and if he has managed to wheedle a compromise out of them so much the better. Is it a season or year long ban? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,114 Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 Various people saying license been granted but have accepted a transfer embargo. This has upset quite a few and I can see there point , but surely it depends on the conditions of the embargo , do people think it would be OK to accept so that we can get back playing competitively. Conditions might be ,loan players allowed to be signed, players below the age of 21 can be signed, players out of contract allowed to be signed. If conditions like this were attached people would see it as a face saving exercise by the SFA , I would go along with it , would fight a total ban , but to get us playing give them a get out of jail card , the end will justify the means . It's not a transfer embargo it's a ban on the registration of players over 18, Bosman's, loans et al. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stewarty 2,060 Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 Said earlier today that the title stripping stories were placed to force our hand with regards to accepting the transfer embargo. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,882 Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 Said earlier today that the title stripping stories were placed to force our hand with regards to accepting the transfer embargo. What does stop the SPL to outdistance the SFA with the stripping of titles? They're in frenzy right now ... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dutchy Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 I think we should just get the lawyers in now and save a whole lot of mucking about. There's obviously something up with all this bullying ways. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.