Zappa 0 Posted July 17, 2012 Share Posted July 17, 2012 If Green doesn't accept the transfer embargo this is just going to drag on and on, so I've changed my mind now and think Green should just accept the embargo and get down to the business of providing Ally with funds to buy in some very good youngsters. We would still be able to sign U18 players and I don't see why we shouldn't be able to win the 3rd division with U18s to supplement what we have left of a squad. We also have some very good players from our own youth teams such as the best from our U17s who were promoted up to help out our struggling U19 team last season. Just get on with it and stop fannying about! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted July 17, 2012 Share Posted July 17, 2012 I agree, as angry as I am at the SFA if we're not going to get a licence otherwise then we need to accept, if anything there's no time to drag it through courts again etc. Season starts in 11 days. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,834 Posted July 17, 2012 Share Posted July 17, 2012 Ahem ... because it is not in the rules? Because if we agree and they asked us to forfeit any legal rights to challenge this, it will open us up for further sanctions? See, I am all for getting back to football again. But we should do it sensibly and not solely according to the SFA's dictatorship. We obey to their rules, no problem. We shall not obey to sanctions that are way beyond reason and against EC employment law - as even UEFA agrees. For it probably needs repeating: our club is victim, not culprit. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest cail Posted July 17, 2012 Share Posted July 17, 2012 (edited) Beginning to go with this way of thinking myself and anyway the squad that is left should be good enough for promotion as champs. Then next season invest appropriately to compete and the same every season after. There can be absolutely no more sanctions after this season though,and this should be emphasized with the utmost rigor,enough is enough. I should also point out that i agree with der berliners post. this shit is doing my fuckin head in Edited July 17, 2012 by cail 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim1955 12 Posted July 17, 2012 Share Posted July 17, 2012 No! This is an illegal sanction and the SFA are not above the law. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GovanAllan 0 Posted July 17, 2012 Share Posted July 17, 2012 No never cave-in to these pricks you give an inch they take a mile. If they were to offer a suspended sentence tho, then I might listen to them. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted July 17, 2012 Author Share Posted July 17, 2012 Ahem ... because it is not in the rules? Because if we agree and they asked us to forfeit any legal rights to challenge this, it will open us up for further sanctions? See, I am all for getting back to football again. But we should do it sensibly and not solely according to the SFA's dictatorship. We obey to their rules, no problem. We shall not obey to sanctions that are way beyond reason and against EC employment law - as even UEFA agrees. For it probably needs repeating: our club is victim, not culprit. I agree dB, but this can't continue to be dragged out because we need to bring in players and play a couple of games before our season starts. IMO, Green should try to broker a deal with the SFA whereby we accept the embargo and £160k fine they hit us with, but draw a line under it at that once and for all. Tell them we won't accept any further SFA or SPL punishments for the actions of the previous owners, but will take their unfair transfer embargo for the sake of puting an end to this madness and getting back to business. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted July 17, 2012 Share Posted July 17, 2012 SFA hold the power here, we still don't have a licence to play football. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GovanAllan 0 Posted July 17, 2012 Share Posted July 17, 2012 I agree dB, but this can't continue to be dragged out because we need to bring in players and play a couple of games before our season starts. IMO, Green should try to broker a deal with the SFA whereby we accept the embargo and £160k fine they hit us with, but draw a line under it at that once and for all. Tell them we won't accept any further SFA or SPL punishments for the actions of the previous owners, but will take their unfair transfer embargo for the sake of puting an end to this madness and getting back to business. In a sensible world Zappa I would agree, but they will just keep coming up with more crap until we say enough and draw a line in the sand. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve1872 4 Posted July 17, 2012 Share Posted July 17, 2012 Meeting between #SFA and #Rangers board continues at Hampden. They've now been talking for 4 hours. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.