Jump to content

 

 

Leggat - Ticketus And The Season Ticket Cash Plea By Green


Recommended Posts

If it was a one man takeover then yes, but if an investor who wants 5% says I want to remain anonymous he/she has that right. This we must know who they are, then every little detail about their private and business life appears on less scrupulous sites. If I was thinking of investing but I knew this would happen I wouldnt touch us with a barge pole.

 

So what if 10 or 11 yahoos put enough money into an investment fund to buy 50 or 55 percent of our club and kill it? What if 75% of the Octopus investors who helped Craig Whyte take our club to the brink of extinction were yahoos?

Link to post
Share on other sites

there's rules to stop you remaining anonymous though.

 

its not allowed for very good reasons.

 

Right and wrong you must make yourself known to the company you are investing in and go through the usual checks, there's no rule that the company have to tell anyone who you are.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So what if 10 or 11 yahoos put enough money into an investment fund to buy 50 or 55 percent of our club and kill it? What if 75% of the Octopus investors who helped Craig Whyte take our club to the brink of extinction were yahoos?

 

A bit of an extreme point Zappa, in that case you have to hope the guy in charge knows the score. Also why no investor should be on the board then they can't kill the club.

 

An investment should be just that an investment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right and wrong you must make yourself known to the company you are investing in and go through the usual checks, there's no rule that the company have to tell anyone who you are.

 

lists of shareholders are published annually by law I believe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Above a certain level and if in a group, the group name only of course I could be wrong.

 

your certainly right about the group. I think and I'm not sure in this but I think all shareholders are listed. perhaps just in listed companies.

 

I know full lists were available for the old plc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Companies complete returns annually that list all of their shareholders and these shareholders would be available.

 

However if someone did not want their identity know they could always set up an off-shore company and have that as the shareholder, and if they do it in a location that allows shareholders to be anonymous then you would not find out anything about them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Obviously, the secrecy surrounding Green's bid is far from ideal. We know that ticketus were sniffing around the TBK bid so it's not beyond belief that they are surruptiitiously trying to get their money back via Green. But there are valid reasons why genuine investors would want to remain anonymous - for example a businessman who invested could expected to be boycotted by the anti-Rangers.

 

If the information of how much each party (named or not) had put forward, and what return they expected were provided I'd have a lot more confidence in purchasing a season ticket. As it stands, I'm going to have to pay up anyway, and keep on worrying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.