Jump to content

 

 

Gio Di Stefano has Got his Rangers Share


Recommended Posts

It's incredible that Clark & Whitehouse were allowed to become our administrators if their company MCR was advising Craig Whyte as far back as 2009. I always knew the whole thing stank to high heavens, but it just keeps getting worse and more incriminating for Duff & Phelps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's incredible that Clark & Whitehouse were allowed to become our administrators if their company MCR was advising Craig Whyte as far back as 2009. I always knew the whole thing stank to high heavens, but it just keeps getting worse and more incriminating for Duff & Phelps.

 

Was this not the reason they had to submit information to the courts?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was this not the reason they had to submit information to the courts?

 

I think so yes, but even if they have been involved in a scam, they're very unlikely to ever admit to it. That's where Di Stefano has a problem. He's adding to the case for their conflict of interest and further implicating them, but actually proving their guilt is another matter altogether.

Link to post
Share on other sites

GIOVANNI DI STEFANO‏@DEVILSADVOKAT

 

LETTER TO THE SFA NOTICE OF INTENTION TO SEEK INJUNCTION page 1 http://twitter.com/DEVILSADVOKAT/status/227915613241241600/photo/1

GIOVANNI DI STEFANO‏@DEVILSADVOKAT

 

LETTER TO THE SFA NOTICE OF INTENTION TO SEEK INJUNCTION page 2 http://twitter.com/DEVILSADVOKAT/status/227915799019536385/photo/1

GIOVANNI DI STEFANO‏@DEVILSADVOKAT

 

LETTER TO THE SFA NOTICE OF INTENTION TO SEEK INJUNCTION page 3 http://twitter.com/DEVILSADVOKAT/status/227915940396941313/photo/1

GIOVANNI DI STEFANO‏@DEVILSADVOKAT

 

PLS RETWEET TO ALL SUPPORTERS LETTER TO THE SFA they were AWARE of the Craig Whyte situation....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think so yes, but even if they have been involved in a scam, they're very unlikely to ever admit to it. That's where Di Stefano has a problem. He's adding to the case for their conflict of interest and further implicating them, but actually proving their guilt is another matter altogether.

 

with conflict of interest absoloute proof isn't required. a perceived conflict of interest should be enough to have d&p refuse to be our administratiors.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know...legal type things are usually written with far more care and attention to language than that letter. Maybe that means nothing, it just raises doubt in my mind.

 

I still think he's whacko, but interesting nevertheless.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.