Guest Dutchy Posted June 22, 2012 Share Posted June 22, 2012 Guess I was hoping for gunsligner, casey or someone that is on RM to pick up on it. As it goes I still don't think there's any conspiracy or that they've actually done us any harm (Murray and Whyte did all the damage) but their competence does look a bit doubtful. They also seem to have been stringing us along about the HMRC being keen on accepting the CVA, which HMRC say they don't accept on their own website. Then again, if that's not enough to convince you of their unreliability, it was CW that wanted them appointed as admins and even went to court to stop HMRC appointing their own choice. Something fishy in that alone, IMO. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GovanAllan 0 Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 Nothing will happen a total waste of time. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 They also seem to have been stringing us along about the HMRC being keen on accepting the CVA, which HMRC say they don't accept on their own website. Then again, if that's not enough to convince you of their unreliability, it was CW that wanted them appointed as admins and even went to court to stop HMRC appointing their own choice. Something fishy in that alone, IMO. The revenue told them they would consider it, not their fault as that's probably policy as well, but them being overly optimistic isn't a big deal to me, CVA had to be tried. The courts had to approve their appointment, so they can't have felt there was anything wrong and didn't HMRC eventually withdraw their application? Whyte feeling he was better off appointing administrators rather than the revenue doesn't mean they're best pals or anything. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 no but the fact they were with him on the day he bought like all his other pals does. today with the players refusing to move just exposes d&p lies even more. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dutchy Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 Well STB, that's probably what we'll find out in this report. Did HMRC actually say they may consider a CVA. Just because D&P said it, doesn't mean it's true, does it? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 d&p definately told bidders hmrc were on board with the idea of a cva. given what actually happened and the fact that d&p were forever pushing a newco I think that may well have been a pack of lies. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Amokachi 0 Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 All they fucking do is make statements. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.