A sustainable future?

[Guest shuggie]

Question Re Rangers Unite : The 1st bullet point on each membership is "Season Ticket Holder: 10 Months Interest Free Option (If Viable)" - is this saying you need to be an ST holder or is it simply one of the "perks" that if you are an ST holder then you get interest free option ? I think it is the latter but am not sure.

 

Would be nice to have a layer of membership for overseas members too - not sure what benefit we could get except maybe a discount on the online season ticket that we currently pay $300 a year for - they may actually get an increase in members if they include that perk for overseas subscribers.

 

You are totally correct in respect of the first point in that membership is for all and as a small thank you we propose to give something back to fans such as ST discount and assistance in paying. With a regular cash flow from monthly memberships there will be less immmediate need for upfront ST cash. All of the 3 levels are indicative and we welcome all fans views as we refine them.

 

In respect of your second point we fully recognise layered membershp. Even tonight we were discussing regional and overseas layers with a structured arangement including syncronised meeting schedules. If I was of a conspiratol mind i would think admin had access to our discussions . Really just recognising a sensible point.

 

If anyone requires any further info just contact me here or at paul@rangersunite.com

[craig 5,199]

Cheers Paul.

[Juancornetto 1]

We shouldn't judge the sustainability of Rangers by the previous regimes follies. It's perfectly feasible to run a successful Rangers on a break even basis, Charles Green certainly seems to think so and so did Bill Miller and Bill Ng. How long you could pull it off for is the question along with how competitive would we be?

 

Good article Max.