Guest Dutchy Posted June 17, 2012 Share Posted June 17, 2012 I need a break again from this confusion, same old sameness from the internet. Everyone shouting the odds, giving their opinions and wee groups coming down on one side, or another with the peace core inbetween shouting, unity, unity. One instance of this, among many others is that someone on this site said that Green is not an investor. This caused me some confusion as in a radio broadcast Ii heard him saying that other investors may sell to the WC group, but that he certainly wouldn't. What exactly is it then, that he hasn't got to sell??? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheWeeBlueDevil 0 Posted June 17, 2012 Share Posted June 17, 2012 (edited) One instance of this, among many others is that someone on this site said that Green is not an investor. This caused me some confusion as in a radio broadcast Ii heard him saying that other investors may sell to the WC group, but that he certainly wouldn't.What exactly is it then, that he hasn't got to sell??? I could be wrong but I think I read somewhere that Green said he will own 2 million worth of shares as payment for his work , I think thats what he referes to when he said that . Edited June 17, 2012 by TheWeeBlueDevil 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted June 17, 2012 Share Posted June 17, 2012 Charles Green has done nothing wrong ? Are you sure ? He has not been honest and open about where his finance is coming from . His claims of backing have gone from the sublime to the ridiculous . Shady consortium of faceless businessmen from all corners of the globe . When he finally does throw out a couple of names they deny all knowledge . He has continually whoared himself in the media since he appeared out of nowhere . Daily ramblings that just got more and more bizarre . European glory , title wins , name changes , transfer warchests , a multitude of potential signings at the cost of millions a few days before he expected creditors to take a pittance in the pound for his so called CVA . His cosseting of the daft Rangers fan was obvious and embarrassing , And his claims of having HMRC onside regarding the CVA were outright lies . Ironic then after all his media interaction that the other day he said the only good thing you get in newspapers was fixh and chips . Wouldn't argue with you there Charles . The fact that he was D&P's preferred option despite his lack of transparency and given that D&P were the preferred option of Craig Whyte and have run a totally shambolic administration that has netted them millions he cannot imo be trusted . The whole thing stinks to the heavens . Mr Green has came from nowhere and now finds himself the happy owner of hundreds of millions of pounds worth of assets he got for a song . He is not the saviour of Rangers . Rangers died and he is the sole benefactor . Well him and whoever it is behind him . For any Rangers fan to say "well he's in charge so we have to back him" is mental . We have been down that road and look where it has led us . He hasn't earned our trust . Quite the opposite i'd say and the sooner he makes his tidy profit and moves on the better . I agree with a lot of what you say but at this moment he has only exaggerated things in the press. He admitted he was doing it to gain a short term profit and then get out. He did the dirty work McColl and gang did not want to do. Give him his reasonable return and let him walk away with his reputation intact. I personally want the Smith consortium but I think Green has just cleared up the mess for others. Don't forget King, who I will be very surprised if he is not somewhere in the background of the deal, said months ago the only way forward for Rangers is Liquidation. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted June 17, 2012 Share Posted June 17, 2012 Green's 'crimes' are people nitpicking at best. I want a smoking gun before I judge. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted June 17, 2012 Share Posted June 17, 2012 Nice to see the same usual suspects who said he didn't have the 8.5mill are still saying he's skint. Just saying like. he didn't have it. his own chairman has confirmed as much. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darthter 542 Posted June 17, 2012 Share Posted June 17, 2012 he didn't have it. his own chairman has confirmed as much. Murray confirmed no such thing!!! He did confirm that they have a little more than the £5.5m purchase price - investment levels most likely changed when the deal did. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted June 17, 2012 Share Posted June 17, 2012 Murray confirmed no such thing!!! He did confirm that they have a little more than the £5.5m purchase price - investment levels most likely changed when the deal did. certainly possible. as is the fact he struggled all the way and never had it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darthter 542 Posted June 17, 2012 Share Posted June 17, 2012 certainly possible. as is the fact he struggled all the way and never had it. It is possible that he has struggled, but the only source for that info has been the media....There are only 2 parties that know the exact amounts available - CG and D&P, everyone else is purely speculating. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted June 17, 2012 Share Posted June 17, 2012 It is possible that he has struggled, but the only source for that info has been the media....There are only 2 parties that know the exact amounts available - CG and D&P, everyone else is purely speculating. then its just as wrong to say he had 8.5 as it is to say he didn't. all we know is he only had 5.5 plus some on Thursday. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazza_8 233 Posted June 17, 2012 Author Share Posted June 17, 2012 (edited) Glad you liked it. You should try it, just by using sybols you can manage to have more coherent posts than you've managed thus far. Sybols? You should maybe stick to using "sybols" if you can't spell! Edited June 17, 2012 by Gazza_8 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.