Guest wickacademyfc Posted November 9, 2006 Share Posted November 9, 2006 Actually arab chap, I can see where your coming from with that. I wish I shared your faith in the rest of the players ability though! Yea I know what u mean but I also 4got to mention I think you should play a 4-3-3 in SPL games - with the exception of the Old Firm.........more attacking play for the full 90 mins is defo needed to be added to your SPL games. What do u think?? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stan Smith Posted November 9, 2006 Share Posted November 9, 2006 Yea I know what u mean but I also 4got to mention I think you should play a 4-3-3 in SPL games - with the exception of the Old Firm.........more attacking play for the full 90 mins is defo needed to be added to your SPL games. What do u think?? Honestly? Never 4-3-3. always 442 as I believe there should always be a midfileder with that bit more energy and savvy, capable of changing role dependant on the game. ie getting pummelled back into midfiled, on the ascendecy push up front etc etc Old fashioned man at heart! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wickacademyfc Posted November 9, 2006 Share Posted November 9, 2006 Yea but Big Eck done alright with the 4-3-3 with the wide front men doing their defensive bit back in midefield I can see Gers getting b8r results if they play that way 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stan Smith Posted November 9, 2006 Share Posted November 9, 2006 Yea but Big Eck done alright with the 4-3-3 with the wide front men doing their defensive bit back in midefield I can see Gers getting b8r results if they play that way Now your taking the piss! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gribz 919 Posted November 10, 2006 Author Share Posted November 10, 2006 I usually get torn right into folks for getting on the anti BF bandwagon, but appreciate you arent doing that and have asked a sensible question. Normally I would just disagree, but the Motherwell game (1st game of the season) was the best I have seen and he wasnt playing. It might have been new team, new season etc etc, but they did well without him.That said, BF was man of the match against Haifi by a country mile so its quite a hard one to say with any conviction. On balance, keep BF playing every week imho Glad someone can reply sensibly also and realise that I wasnt being anti BF and just asking the question I thought against Dundee Utd at Ibrox that that was the best id seen Rangers play in years despite the freak result. It really should have been 8-2 that day. Also agree in europe he is a different player and controls games properly! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.