the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 27, 2012 Share Posted May 27, 2012 I don't think you know what you are talking about. can you expand on that? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,624 Posted May 28, 2012 Share Posted May 28, 2012 can you expand on that? The suggestion that professional self-regulatory bodies are highly likely to cover up for a (relatively small) member and put the reputaton of the body at risk is not realistic. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 28, 2012 Share Posted May 28, 2012 The suggestion that professional self-regulatory bodies are highly likely to cover up for a (relatively small) member and put the reputaton of the body at risk is not realistic. I certainly hope so. thanks for clearing that up. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GovanAllan 0 Posted May 28, 2012 Share Posted May 28, 2012 Again after all the mud throwing just where in all the emails does it say this money is for the purchase of the club? Absolutely no where, so whether any of us think he's lying or not you can't categorically prove he is. End of case come back when you can prove it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 28, 2012 Share Posted May 28, 2012 Again after all the mud throwing just where in all the emails does it say this money is for the purchase of the club? Absolutely no where, so whether any of us think he's lying or not you can't categorically prove he is. End of case come back when you can prove it. equally if you believe he though 24 million was for running costs your being naive. also he lied and said it was for a small amount why is he lying? he's guilty we have enough information to see that clearly. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darthter 542 Posted May 28, 2012 Share Posted May 28, 2012 equally if you believe he though 24 million was for running costs your being naive. also he lied and said it was for a small amount why is he lying? he's guilty we have enough information to see that clearly. do any of the email actually state the amount in question??? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 28, 2012 Share Posted May 28, 2012 no but the invoivces do. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GovanAllan 0 Posted May 28, 2012 Share Posted May 28, 2012 equally if you believe he though 24 million was for running costs your being naive. also he lied and said it was for a small amount why is he lying? he's guilty we have enough information to see that clearly. Ok for the last time this will be investigated properly show me where the emails say this money is for the purchase of the club, not what you think it means or what you want it to mean. What it actually says and that is all that will matter when it comes right down to it, and its not in black and white. As for being naive that's up to you mate, I tend to look for hard facts in life when I'm trying to crucify somebody because if you get it wrong you just end up looking like a stupid prick. Show me the hard facts in black & white that shows the money was intended for the purchase and I will hang the bastard myself but it just isn't there. Also if Ticketus had hard facts that Greir knew what was happening don't you think they would be chasing D&P through the courts? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GovanAllan 0 Posted May 28, 2012 Share Posted May 28, 2012 no but the invoivces do. Invoices for what? The money from Ticketus he's not arguing that money came from Ticketus he's arguing that he didn't know that it was to be used to buy the club. And whether we believe him or not it can't be proved definately beyond doubt which is something the Beeb don't do very well. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 28, 2012 Share Posted May 28, 2012 Ok for the last time this will be investigated properly show me where the emails say this money is for the purchase of the club, not what you think it means or what you want it to mean. What it actually says and that is all that will matter when it comes right down to it, and its not in black and white. As for being naive that's up to you mate, I tend to look for hard facts in life when I'm trying to crucify somebody because if you get it wrong you just end up looking like a stupid prick. Show me the hard facts in black & white that shows the money was intended for the purchase and I will hang the bastard myself but it just isn't there. Also if Ticketus had hard facts that Greir knew what was happening don't you think they would be chasing D&P through the courts? tickets will be chasing whyte. then if they don't get all there cash maybe they chase others. of course ticketus also knew it was for the purchase of the club so I don't see how they can sue others for being in on the con they knowingly funded. as I say for me this is simple. if the invoices were for 24 million he's lied and is guilty. if they are indeed for a smaller amount as grier claims he's in the clear. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.