stewarty 2,123 Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 If I was D&P I'd be seeking legal advice. Anyone for a wee injunction telling the SPL to feck off as their demands are time consuming and would be to the detriment of their ability to get the CVA done? This is their primary concern and god knows we can do without them getting any further distracted from it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 If I was D&P I'd be seeking legal advice. Anyone for a wee injunction telling the SPL to feck off as their demands are time consuming and would be to the detriment of their ability to get the CVA done? This is their primary concern and god knows we can do without them getting any further distracted from it. It's a disgrace the way the SPL and SFA have hampered and delayed our administration process. They're like a bunch of headless chickens running around with machetes with our name on them in one hand and broadcasting rights contracts in the other. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stewarty 2,123 Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 It's a disgrace the way the SPL and SFA have hampered and delayed our administration process. They're like a bunch of headless chickens running around with machetes with our name on them in one hand and broadcasting rights contracts in the other. Hence why I'd be keen for m'learned friends to be consulted and for them to draft a wee letter to Herr Doncaster 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluebear54 0 Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 Wind back to last night's documentary. There was a clear and convenient blurring between RFC, Murray Group, D&P and a porn star (amongst others). Essentially let's paint "the big picture" and let's call that picture RFC. Doesn't matter, it's the same thing. Bollocks, and shameful. This report is much the same. SPL have reportedly made a request to RFC's administrators, but BBC are reporting it as "setting a deadline" for RFC, and go on to report that the SPL will consider sanctions against the Club. Once again, and particularly in this case, where there is a court appointed authority effectively running the Club, how the hell can the SPL justify sanctions against the Club when they have an issue with the administrators? It's like getting done for shoplifting half a pound of mince. The police release you without charge, but Tesco decide to fine you £500, and the packaging company want you hung drawn and quartered then packaged into half pound packages just to teach you a lesson. Rough justice of course. Andof course it doesn't happen in the real world, so why should this happen with RFC? We (as in RFC) desperately need some serious legal advice, some informed PR/Comms output, and some spokespersons to step in and help us in the medium term. The pitch is important, but Jeez, we won't need it if a stand isn't made soon. No better case for the RFFF. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 Hence why I'd be keen for m'learned friends to be consulted and for them to draft a wee letter to Herr Doncaster He'd file it under D for deflect, D for deny or D for don't have an answer. Then there's D for Doncaster and D for dunce. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.