forlanssister 3,092 Posted May 3, 2012 Share Posted May 3, 2012 Can we assume Close are better run than Ticketus? Obviously, since they had the wit to get a fixed charge for a sum of roughly 6% of what Ticketus are owed! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,092 Posted May 3, 2012 Share Posted May 3, 2012 Do Close appear on the creditors listing? How much are they owed? Less: Fixed Charge Holders The Rangers FC Group Limited 2 TBC Close Leasing Limited 3 (1,560,000) Scottish Sporting Council 3 (505,000) Premier Property Group Limited 2 TBC Bank of Scotland (Albion Road Finance) 2 TBC Kelvinside War Memorial Trust 2 TBC (2,065,000 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,383 Posted May 3, 2012 Share Posted May 3, 2012 Obviously, since they had the wit to get a fixed charge for a sum of roughly 6% of what Ticketus are owed! I forgot the 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,092 Posted May 3, 2012 Share Posted May 3, 2012 The numbers 2 and 3 are notes in the statement 2. The Joint Administrators are yet to receive details of claims from these chargeholders. 3. The Joint Administrators are yet to review and adjudicate these claims. So it's not beyond the realms of possibility that unsecured creditors will receive absolutely zero return, (is that correct Bluedell?) 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,488 Posted May 3, 2012 Share Posted May 3, 2012 The numbers 2 and 3 are notes in the statement 2. The Joint Administrators are yet to receive details of claims from these chargeholders. 3. The Joint Administrators are yet to review and adjudicate these claims. So it's not beyond the realms of possibility that unsecured creditors will receive absolutely zero return, (is that correct Bluedell?) Depends on the value of the TBCs, but it's not going to be a huge amount. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest themightymcphed Posted May 3, 2012 Share Posted May 3, 2012 Can someone clarify what the score is with Auchenhowie and Ibrox please? If he has a "floating charge" on them, what happens in regard to transferring them to the newco? Also, read something about the oldco having shares in the newco and if BTC went against us and the oldco was liquidated that would give HMRC an avenue to go after the newco. I'm not clear on those points and would appreciate someone clarifying it for me. Too much timmy propaganda saying different things. Cheers 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 0 Posted May 3, 2012 Share Posted May 3, 2012 (edited) Because he owns the shares of The Rangers Football Club P.L.C, company number SC4276, founded on 27 May 1899. The company may not have any assets going forward but it is what it is. I don't see any future merger taking place anyway, but thanks for replying. Edited May 3, 2012 by caseyjones 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
capstans 0 Posted May 3, 2012 Author Share Posted May 3, 2012 I would like someone to tell me Whyte doesn't own Ibrox or Auchenhowie, to my disappointment a lawyer tells me he does. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darthter 542 Posted May 3, 2012 Share Posted May 3, 2012 I would like someone to tell me Whyte doesn't own Ibrox or Auchenhowie, to my disappointment a lawyer tells me he does. I believe RFC Plc own Ibrox, MP & Albion car park.....these can be sold by the Admins 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,092 Posted May 3, 2012 Share Posted May 3, 2012 I believe RFC Plc own Ibrox, MP & Albion car park.....these can be sold by the Admins They would have to satisfy the various charges held against these assets first before they can sell them. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.