chilledbear 16 Posted May 4, 2012 Share Posted May 4, 2012 My criticism of the RST/MD was not them giving their support to TBK, but their deflection of any questions of the consortium. The question of fan ownership or representation on the Board, should in my mind be an aim, it should not come before the safety and security of our Club. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted May 4, 2012 Share Posted May 4, 2012 No need to get intimate and personal here. I'm no "no-matter-what RST man" or "defender", just wondering about the open and continued animosity by some. Are you asking about the RST about the "continued animosity by some" ? The RST are sometimes as guilty as regular Bears when it comes to the creation of animosity. MD made a comment that the fans were "united" and followed it up, in the same breath, by stating that "REAL Rangers fans know they should be supportive of TBK" - that comment in, and of itself, creates animosity. That is not a snipe at MD but he is in a position of relative power that he needs to be more selective on how he phrases things. Nobody is perfect - but the RST have had their issues with their Twitter and FB accounts - so they are hardly completely innocent. There are supporters of the RST in this forum which is good. There are, however, also detractors, which is also good. It is hardly a fellowship when people come in and say they think the RST is done. They are merely contextualising what many fellow Bears feel. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.