Jump to content

 

 

SSN: Bill Miller Statement


Recommended Posts

Why dont TBK borrow the money from Kennedy ? If both really have the club's interests at heart I am sure TBK will get a better interest rate from Kennedy than Ticketus, and Kennedy could get some level of participation at board level without actually having ownership ?

 

 

There’s a though!!

 

Big thumbs up :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I always felt that Duff & Phelps were acting above board, simply because they have an ethical obligation do so so, being governed by the Insolvency Practitioner's Association.

 

I am swiftly changing my opinion (which doesnt happen very often). I think they are at it, and likely at it on behalf of Whyte.

 

If we were organised enough we would make complaints to the IPA against Clark & Whitehouse.

 

They have had a chance to cover themselves in glory but have simply succeeded in covering themselves in shit. Shame on them.

Edited by craig
Link to post
Share on other sites

I always felt that Duff & Phelps were acting above board, simply because they have an ethical obligation do so so, being governed by the Insovency Practitioner's Association.

 

I am swiftly changing my opinion (which doesnt happen very often). I think they are at it, and likely at it on behalf of Whyte.

 

If we were organised enough we would make complaints to the IPA against Clark & Whitehouse.

 

They have had a chance to cover themselves in glory but have simply succeeded in covering themselves in shit. Shame on them.

 

They will have ensured that they have covered themselves with regard to any investigation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The way I am reading/understanding Bill Miller's proposal is this:

 

At present, certain creditors are not co-operating.

If the club is liquidated, all assets (Ibrox, MP, Players etc) are sold off, and the resulting moneys pay off the admins and the rest goes to the creditors.

What I believe Bill Miller is proposing is to purchase the assets, and move them to another company. This would render Rangers FC PLC completely worthless. He can then go back to the creditors and force a decision - accept a CVA on his terms & get some kind of return, or liquidate the company (which has zero assets or value) and get nothing.

 

Logic would dictate that problematic creditors would prefer something over nothing, and the CVA gets approved and folk get their money. Rangers FC PLC is then officially debt free, and the assets transferred back.

 

I may (probably am) be completely wrong in my thoughts above...but they do kinda make sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks to me more like he is trying to "silo" the toxicity of getting a CVA done. Looking to basically take the club into a new corporate structure and then have the parent with all the debts looming stay as is. So long as the entity left with the debt still embarks on a CVA then, as far as I see, that isnt liquidation, it is still a CVA - all he is doing is trying to prevent sanctions on the club by creating a separate entity that can move forward.

 

The problem with all of that is that the SPL/SFA will never go for it because if they do there is no guarantee that Miller doesnt get confirmation that history isnt lost and then say "right, lets liquidate this other piece of shit". Also, would be difficult to see how any creditors would accept it too.... basically it looks like he is looking to move all the assets (Ibrox, MP, players etc) into "newco" - this has the effect of giving the creditors nothing tangible to claim against.

 

I doubt it would be given the seal of approval to be honest.

 

They should all combine their funds, buy the club, and THEN work out who should own it going forward. Would never happen, but it would, for the moment at least, remove the spectre of liquidation....

 

 

Isn't this basically what Celtic currently have going on though?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just listened to Mark Dingwall's interview on talkSPORT and he said that he doesn't think Miller's proposal would be legal.

 

He's also now reverted back to the stance that it's The Blue Knights or liquidation. Interesting claim considering that The Blue Knights don't have a bid on the table and don't yet have the means to put a good bid on the table either.

Edited by Zappa
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just listened to Mark Dingwall's interview on talkSPORT and he said that he doesn't think Miller's proposal would be legal.

 

He's also now reverted back to the stance that it's The Blue Knights or liquidation. Interesting claim considering that The Blue Knights don't have a bid on the table and don't yet have the means to put a good bid on the table either.

 

If we are to believe what has been said today, by both Miller and D&P, then Dingwall is correct. If TBK don't get preferred bidder status, we will be liquidated next week. There is no way that the footballing authorities could give written guarantees that there would be no sanctions against us. That would see the end of Miller's involvement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.