caseyjones 0 Posted April 11, 2012 Share Posted April 11, 2012 Training ground: We will hold a referendum with the fans inviting them to rename Auchenhowie. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 0 Posted April 11, 2012 Share Posted April 11, 2012 CW comparisons: We are not venture capitalists or asset strippers. We are committed to restoring RFC integrity in world football. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,097 Posted April 11, 2012 Share Posted April 11, 2012 I don't think anyone is revealing how much they are investing, are they? However it's difficult to get behind a bid where we don't know who the owners are going to be and why they want to invest. None of the bids are doing themselves many favours, but then again, they don't have to at this point. Questions were asked on this board about another of the bidders surely in the interests of fairness the same questions should be asked of any and all bidders? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super_Ally 0 Posted April 11, 2012 Share Posted April 11, 2012 Questions were asked on this board about another of the bidders surely in the interests of fairness the same questions should be asked of any and all bidders? Your posts on the matter come across defensive and as if you have a vested interest in one of the bids or lack impartiality. Whilst I agree that questions should be asked of all bids i'm sceptical of your motives. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,553 Posted April 11, 2012 Share Posted April 11, 2012 Questions were asked on this board about another of the bidders surely in the interests of fairness the same questions should be asked of any and all bidders? Absolutely. I'm not against asking questions and some should be answered (members of the consortium) but it's perhaps unrealistic for others to be answered at this stage. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,484 Posted April 11, 2012 Author Share Posted April 11, 2012 Please folks - no arguing over stuff, that's counter-productive, We all want the best for the club and until we know more, folk are right to ask questions. The Asian-Pacific bid (told to emphasis that now) understands that and simply ask for time before revealing more in due course. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,097 Posted April 11, 2012 Share Posted April 11, 2012 Your posts on the matter come across defensive and as if you have a vested interest in one of the bids or lack impartiality. Whilst I agree that questions should be asked of all bids i'm sceptical of your motives. My motive is a level playing field, let the same standards apply to each bid. I have no personal interest vested or otherwise in any of the 3 bids other than a desire to avoid the winding up of Rangers Football Club plc. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim1955 12 Posted April 11, 2012 Share Posted April 11, 2012 Training ground: We will hold a referendum with the fans inviting them to rename Auchenhowie. Auchenhowie is the name of the road where Murray park is situated, suspect this could be a suggestion to rename Murray Park. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54andcounting 0 Posted April 11, 2012 Share Posted April 11, 2012 CW comparisons: We are not venture capitalists or asset strippers. We are committed to restoring RFC integrity in world football. Cheers mate, I'm on a high now. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 0 Posted April 11, 2012 Share Posted April 11, 2012 With respect to developing news over last hour, we may make further comment later once statements are digested. Many thanks! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.