Jump to content

 

 

SFA can forget axe for Whyte


Recommended Posts

THE SFA have no power to remove Craig Whyte as a Rangers director.

 

Their decision to brand him not a fit and proper person to hold office is a â??red herringâ?, according to a Hampden insider.

 

The SFA charged Whyte with seven alleged rule breaches and deemed him unfit to be a club official.

 

Whyte snubbed an SFA hearing on March 29, but his lawyers asked for it to be postponed to give them time to prepare a case.

 

Our insider said: â??This business is a total red herring. The SFA has no jurisdiction to prevent ANYONE being a director of a Scottish football club.

 

â??They can say heâ??s not fit and proper all they want. All that means is the person cannot represent his club at the SFA council meeting and they cannot go to the AGM.

 

â??The SFA are entitled to ask if the person breaches their Articles 10-13, but these simply ask if he is a fit and proper person, if heâ??s ever suffered from a mental disorder, or if heâ??s listed as an official of another club.

 

â??Itâ??s a matter for Companies House who clubs have on their boards. The SFA canâ??t do anything about it.â?

 

Read more: http://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/scotsol/homepage/sport/spl/4239745/SFA-can-forget-axe-for-Whyte.html#ixzz1r7GLU05o

Link to post
Share on other sites

THE SFA have no power to remove Craig Whyte as a Rangers director.

 

Their decision to brand him not a fit and proper person to hold office is a “red herring”, according to a Hampden insider.

 

The SFA charged Whyte with seven alleged rule breaches and deemed him unfit to be a club official.

 

Whyte snubbed an SFA hearing on March 29, but his lawyers asked for it to be postponed to give them time to prepare a case.

 

Our insider said: “This business is a total red herring. The SFA has no jurisdiction to prevent ANYONE being a director of a Scottish football club.

 

“They can say he’s not fit and proper all they want. All that means is the person cannot represent his club at the SFA council meeting and they cannot go to the AGM.

 

“The SFA are entitled to ask if the person breaches their Articles 10-13, but these simply ask if he is a fit and proper person, if he’s ever suffered from a mental disorder, or if he’s listed as an official of another club.

 

“It’s a matter for Companies House who clubs have on their boards. The SFA can’t do anything about it.”

 

Read more: http://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/scotsol/homepage/sport/spl/4239745/SFA-can-forget-axe-for-Whyte.html#ixzz1r7GLU05o

 

 

I'm flabbergasted that this

if he’s ever suffered from a mental disorder
is allowed as part of a fit & proper test. I thought we'd moved on as a society. Can they honestly reject someone on the basis of past mental health grounds?

 

Seriously boggled here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.