Jump to content

 

 

Rangers And Whyte To Learn Fate At Hampden


Recommended Posts

The Scottish Football Association will consider disciplinary cases against Rangers and Craig Whyte at a meeting of their Judicial Panel on Thursday morning. The hearing has been scheduled after the conclusion of an independent inquiry into the administration-hit club.

 

The club are accused of breaching five disciplinary rules, while Whyte has allegedly broken two. The timescale of the offences stretches back to May 6, 2011, when Whyte took control of the club following his purchase of Sir David Murrayâ??s majority shareholding.

 

Both parties have been issued with notices of complaint by the Scottish FA's compliance officer. If found guilty, Whyte could be ejected from the game, essentially confirming the Scottish FA board's belief he is not a fit and proper person.

 

STV understands Whyte is unlikely to attend in person, while Rangers will be represented by the club's administrators and lawyers. Both are accused of breaching rules 66 and 71.

 

Rule 66 gives the Scottish FA scope to punish both a club and an official for bringing the game into disrepute.

 

Rule 71 warns against any party not acting in the best interests of the game or acting in an improper manner.

 

Rule 1 (b) covers any failure by the club to comply with the SFAâ??s Articles of Association as a club, while rule 2 concerns individual officials from the member club breaching the same articles.

 

Rule 14 (g) concerns the clubâ??s appointment of administrators. The SFA can fine, suspend or ultimately terminate the membership of any club that â??is subject to an insolvency eventâ?.

 

Rule 66 covers any incident or behaviour that is considered to bring the game into disrepute while rule 71 demands that every club or individual representing the club acts in the best interests of the SFA.

 

In addition to the charges facing Rangers as a club, owner Craig Whyte has also been charged as an individual with having breached rules 66 and 71.

 

If found guilty, the punishment for Rangers and Whyte could vary. The sanctions available for breaching rules 1 and 2 can be a fine or suspension from the game while the other three regulations carry potentially higher penalties.

 

Rule 14 adds the possibility of membership being terminated while the latter two rules carry a wider range of sanctions. A fine, suspension or termination can still be applied but the club could be banned from the Scottish Cup under rule 66 or 71 while Whyte as an individual could be "ejected" from the game.

Edited by caseyjones
Link to post
Share on other sites

Who is this Alex Thompson Frankie, see you mentioning him on Twitter from time to time

 

C4 news investigative journalist.

 

Has a good reputation but his work on RFC has been very disappointing so far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, the admins push for a takeover and ... guess what: the authorities deem it cool to leave the club in the balance over their decision. So ... one might speculate (sic!) that they now wait to see what comes of the takeover and once it has been successfully done, they will shed more agony over us with some silly ban or penalty.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.