Zappa 0 Posted March 29, 2012 Share Posted March 29, 2012 Is he the same Andrew McCormick who was an agent with links to Mcoist? Apparently, yes. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stimpy 0 Posted March 29, 2012 Share Posted March 29, 2012 Is he the same Andrew McCormick who was an agent with links to McCoist? Walter and McCoist's accountant? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 0 Posted March 29, 2012 Share Posted March 29, 2012 Walter and McCoist's accountant? I don't know, mate. I thought McCoist was a director in an agency he was licensed to. He was Naismith's agent, if I remember rightly. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stimpy 0 Posted March 29, 2012 Share Posted March 29, 2012 I don't know, mate. I thought McCoist was a director in an agency he was licensed to. He was Naismith's agent, if I remember rightly. Aye, I heard something like Ally and Durrant has some agency and Edu was signed up to it. Can't confirm whether it's true or not. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,114 Posted March 29, 2012 Share Posted March 29, 2012 Aye, I heard something like Ally and Durrant has some agency and Edu was signed up to it. Can't confirm whether it's true or not. ...and for der Berliner's benefit they're not f*&king fakes. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stimpy 0 Posted March 29, 2012 Share Posted March 29, 2012 You're bloody dangerous, Forlan:D 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted March 29, 2012 Share Posted March 29, 2012 What relevance does McCormick's management agency (and Ally's share in it) have to the subject matter of this thread? Even if some people might think there's a conflict of interest on McCormick's part, it doesn't mean there is one. He's an accountant who's a Rangers fan and working for the RFFF free of charge. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluebear54 0 Posted March 29, 2012 Share Posted March 29, 2012 This thread is evidence that fan ownership will make a far poorer job of running our Club than CW did. It would split the support into factions and pit Bear against Bear. It would ultimately destroy the support - which is our greatest asset. Now - don't get me wrong. I'm all for transparency and accountability. Also I believe that the right mechanisms should be there to ensure that a broad church of the fan base oversee that. However, decision making, policy and press releases/interaction should be left to someone other than the fans. Take on board opinion by all means. But a few fans deeming to speak for the Club without thinking it through is pretty naive - and in this case, pretty petty and eventually self- destructive. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,114 Posted March 29, 2012 Share Posted March 29, 2012 What relevance does McCormick's management agency (and Ally's share in it) have to the subject matter of this thread? Even if some people might think there's a conflict of interest on McCormick's part, it doesn't mean there is one. He's an accountant who's a Rangers fan and working for the RFFF free of charge. Was just confirming caseyjones and shorerdbear's posts. Certainly wasn't inferring anything about anybody. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted March 29, 2012 Share Posted March 29, 2012 Was just confirming caseyjones and shorerdbear's posts. Certainly wasn't inferring anything about anybody. No problem at all, although I will say that it's a bit odd making that document public after questioning BH making the John Bennett stuff public. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.