54andcounting 0 Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 SEPARATE ISSUE: I suppose it belongs in this thread. When septic turned up at Ibrox yesterday lennon blew kisses to Rangers fans and the police pulled him into a room and told him off. The guy has no self respect just a total tosser. (True story from G4S) 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juancornetto 1 Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 It's obvious he hasn't learned anything from his two previous disciplinary breaches, throw the book at the childish little cretin. Three strikes and all that.... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gers4Life 0 Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 It's obvious he hasn't learned anything from his two previous disciplinary breaches, throw the book at the childish little cretin. Three strikes and all that.... 100% agree and I hope the sfa throw the kitchen sink at this clown and make a fuckin example of him! How long is he going to get away with these comments and his actions track side...... It's time the sfa/spl grew a pair and ban this idiot! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 Well they have been quick this week with their 'notice' what was the delay last week when his criticism of the official was even more verbally abusive 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dutchy Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 lemon says he's entitled to speak to the ref about his decisions, but ex-ref, Kenny Clark is on BBC radio suggesting that at half time, he is not entitled to question the ref. Then again, it all seems to be coming down to he said, I said, you said!!! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 lemon says he's entitled to speak to the ref about his decisions, but ex-ref, Kenny Clark is on BBC radio suggesting that at half time, he is not entitled to question the ref. Then again, it all seems to be coming down to he said, I said, you said!!! If your first sentence is true (that he cant question the ref at HT) then your 2nd sentence becomes irrelevant (not having a go at you, just in terms of the tit-for-tat that Lennon is engaging in). Lennon admitted he asked the ref some stuff at HT. So if Clark is right then the ref is right to send him to the stand. Lennon WILL get his comeuppance and when it happens, it wont have happened to a better person. Funny how he is back-tracking on his expose of what McCoist said to him in the shame game last year - now saying he wont be revealing anything, he said it tongue-in-cheek. Neil Lennon is, simply a 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dutchy Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 Given the skewed logic of lemon, nothing is irrelevant. Or so he would say. I've also heard that his sending off is as much for what he said to the 4th offical during the first half, so he's fecked either way. Hopefully anyway! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 I've also heard that his sending off is as much for what he said to the 4th offical during the first half I certainly get that impression. He was apparently shouting abuse at Calum Murray from the touchline and giving the 4th official (Brines) abuse as well. By the sounds of it, he was actually lucky to be allowed to stay in the dugout till half time. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,626 Posted March 26, 2012 Author Share Posted March 26, 2012 Thing is,the refs will be getting pissed off with him always complaining how poor he thinks they all are,now the SFA better start bringing him to task or it wouldn't surprise me if they went on strike again. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 Notice of Complaint issuedMonday, 26 March 2012 The Compliance Officer has issued the following Notice of Complaint: Name: Neil Lennon, Celtic FC Match: Rangers v Celtic (Scottish Premier League) - 25th March 2012 Disciplinary Rule(s) allegedly breached: Rule 203 Principal Hearing Date: Thursday, 19th April 2012 Mr. Lennon has until Tuesday, 3rd April 2012 to respond to the Notice of Complaint. Rule 203: No member of Team Staff shall commit Misconduct at a match, including but not limited to committing acts of the kind described in the Schedule of Offences in Annex C * * Misconduct at a match by dissent, the adoption of aggressive behaviour towards a match official and the repeated use of offensive, abusing and insulting language. It's an interesting rule, which seems to suggest that "use of offensive, abusing and insulting language." is OK provided that it isn't repeated? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.