54andcounting 0 Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 If Whyte is found not to be a fit and proper person to hold a position within association football, could that not mean his selling off of the 16 Arsenal shares will be deemed illegal? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,114 Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 No it wouldn't. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 If Whyte is found not to be a fit and proper person to hold a position within association football, could that not mean his selling off of the 16 Arsenal shares will be deemed illegal? Absolutely not. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 If he is found guilty of taking over Rangers by illegal means (selling season tickets before he owned Rangers) then selling the Arsenal shares was theft. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 (edited) If he is found guilty of taking over Rangers by illegal means (selling season tickets before he owned Rangers) then selling the Arsenal shares was theft. I doubt if it's theft though it certainly was morally bankrupt. No doubt that's a line the administrators might pursue; how can you sell something you don't legitimately own? Jelavic? But I think that the problem might be that it wasn't Craig Whyte who sold anything it was the Club, so if the sales were carried out properly then it might be difficult to unravel but it's worth a shout. Edited March 9, 2012 by BrahimHemdani 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.