aweebluesoandso 290 Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 Metaphorically speaking It's been like putting a giant Jigsaw puzzle together, trying to work out where all the pieces went. It's only half way finished but if you stand back you get idea what the full picture is like. it's a huge panoramic of Ibrox on match day, But somehow i think some of the pieces are going to be missing in the directors box with this one. I need to stay off the Cocoa 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54andcounting 0 Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 If this is true then why are the RST/RSA and Paul Murray desperately trying to get into bed with ticketus? ....because we owe them? What is it 4 years? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted March 10, 2012 Author Share Posted March 10, 2012 What about breaking it down into sections of questions for the various parties involved? We could have: Questions for Craig Whyte Questions for Lloyds Questions for Ticketus Questions for the Administrators Questions for The Blue Knights Questions for the SFA I'll add the questions you've all already posted into the section it suits best and with any new questions you can maybe shape them to suit a section? Does that make sense? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 If this is true then why are the RST/RSA and Paul Murray desperately trying to get into bed with ticketus? If it is not true why would Ticketus want in with the RST/RSA and Paul Murray? I believe they see it as the only way to get their money back. There is a court case shortly where the Administrators are going to try and free Rangers from the Ticketus deal. If they lose that they walk away with a 24million red face and nothing to show for it. As I said it has been said a few times by the administrators that Ticketus are not creditors. Their money never passed through the club how can they then be creditors? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluebear54 0 Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 Do we honestly believe that the Scottish media will have an unbiased agenda in finding out what has happened at our Club? Frankie's right - there should be a Public Inquiry. Either that or the mother of all court cases. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbr 1,270 Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 Who was the person who initially came forward with the EBT scheme as a realistic way of paying players , who did they work for and why did Rangers fc pay MIH £500,000 pa for legal and tax advice 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CumbernauldGers 0 Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 Why did Wylde and Celik leave for free when they are on low wages and the whole team were in the process of agreeing wage cuts? Why did the head of the players union say they both felt it was time to move on and not talk about the money saying side of it? Why were both young players not getting a game after signinglong term contracts? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
capstans 0 Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 Who owns what. Why is the floating charge alleged to be irrelevant yet when the bank held it it was the Holy Grail. Don't insult our intelligence by saying Whyte didn't putin any money, that would stand the age old business tenet of never use your own money on its head. Why are we not united in our quest fot stability to many schemes and factions fighting for blazers, plenty of freeloaders and glory hunters when we need a leader with a single purpose, that being the well being of the club. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,716 Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 Why is the floating charge alleged to be irrelevant yet when the bank held it it was the Holy Grail.. coz the club owed the bank money but it doesn't owe Whyte anything. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
capstans 0 Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 The administrator suggested Whyte may be due nothing, a long way from saying he is due nothing. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.