Jump to content

 

 

Administrators' Statement


Recommended Posts

Muir did seem very pally with CW in the directors' box during the first couple of games, but hasn#'t been seen since.

 

That's something which maybe shouldn't be overlooked or considered as merely a coincidence. After all, Muir was on our board on behalf of LBG and LBG swiftly got their £18m. We don't have anything clear enough to throw around accusations, but I definitely think questions should be asked.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Muir did seem very pally with CW in the directors' box during the first couple of games, but hasn#'t been seen since.

 

I'm not fan of Muir but I still tend towards him not knowing. whyte's MO seems to be to for nobody to know.

 

Perhaps the possibility of a bonus for ridding LBG and MIH of a large headache.

 

Donald Muir in the Rangers delegation with Ali Russell and Gordon Smith

 

28/12/11

 

 

http://willievass.photoshelter.com/gallery-image/281211-Celtic-v-Rangers/G0000Pwkid1vKUzQ/I00006nrTtxPg0y8

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it all comes down to timing. Unless and until we have a timeline it is difficult to know what chonology shows to let us see when the debt was created.

 

Once Craig Whyte had paid his pound and the deal was signed he was given a free hand to do what he wanted with the club. During the due diligence it would have been obvious to him that a deal could be done with Ticketus. Ticketus would have been foaming at the mouth to get such a long term deal. I doubt if Muir would know or really care where the 18 mill was coming from as long as he was on his bonus for retrieving the money. Cal I don't believe that any deal had to be done before he bought the club all that came after he owned it. The only thing that is not clear to me is that did anyone ever see the 30 million he was supposed to have given proof of having. If not then David Murray must be guilty of something here. If it was available to see then Whyte either forged papers or he could put that amount of money somewhere on an account. Probably a temporary moving of money or Guarantees from somewhere to be moved as soon as he had signed the papers. He certainly worked on a robbing Peter to pay Paul basis.

 

I am no expert and these are just my thoughts and open to being totally crap.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.