forlanssister 3,114 Posted February 17, 2012 Share Posted February 17, 2012 http://www.octopusinvestments.com/press/news.html?newsId=363 OCTOPUS PRESS STATEMENT ON TICKETUS 17 February 2012 Octopus Investments would like to clarify the position of Ticketus with regard to the current Glasgow Rangers coverage. Ticketus is one of the many entities into which Octopus Protected EIS invests. Ticketus has purchased tickets for Glasgow Rangers games for a number of seasons in advance, as it has done for a number of years previously with the club. Ticketus does not lend money; Ticketus is the owner of assets - the tickets. Octopus is continuing to work with the administrators and Glasgow Rangers on this matter. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,679 Posted February 17, 2012 Share Posted February 17, 2012 Question to Ticketus. Why didn't you pay Glasgow Rangers for the tickets that you purchased? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,114 Posted February 17, 2012 Author Share Posted February 17, 2012 Question to Ticketus. Why didn't you pay Glasgow Rangers for the tickets that you purchased? Perhaps they led to believe that the RFC Group Ltd was Glasgow Rangers. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted February 17, 2012 Share Posted February 17, 2012 How can they be owner of assets if the tickets have not been sold yet? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears 0 Posted February 17, 2012 Share Posted February 17, 2012 Can someone tell us if this is good or bad please 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,114 Posted February 17, 2012 Author Share Posted February 17, 2012 How can they be owner of assets if the tickets have not been sold yet? They have been sold they just haven't been resold yet. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dutchy Posted February 17, 2012 Share Posted February 17, 2012 Sounds like another thread about who is secured, and who isn't. Who do we owe money to and who we don't. I don't understand all of the financial goings on of business, except that it seems to be crowded by tax dogers of exceptional talents for telling porkies. Then again, yoou can't blame them for that, after all, they say it's all legal and above board, so mabye we should ask our politicians what the fcuk are they doing to solve these tax problems? We know they'll stuff the ordinary tax payer, mainly because they can't afford all these tax lawyers. There's a game on tomorrow and I'll be trying my best to filter out any references of financial law from commetators who don't have a glue, just many diffirent shades of opinion, all of which seem to be anti Rangers. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GovanAllan 0 Posted February 17, 2012 Share Posted February 17, 2012 Sounds like another thread about who is secured, and who isn't. Who do we owe money to and who we don't. I don't understand all of the financial goings on of business, except that it seems to be crowded by tax dogers of exceptional talents for telling porkies. Then again, yoou can't blame them for that, after all, they say it's all legal and above board, so mabye we should ask our politicians what the fcuk are they doing to solve these tax problems? We know they'll stuff the ordinary tax payer, mainly because they can't afford all these tax lawyers. There's a game on tomorrow and I'll be trying my best to filter out any references of financial law from commetators who don't have a glue, just many diffirent shades of opinion, all of which seem to be anti Rangers. Spot on Dutchy in a nutshell, tax is to keep the average man in his place and let the rich hold on too as much as they can because they can afford the fancy tax experts. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,665 Posted February 17, 2012 Share Posted February 17, 2012 Can someone tell us if this is good or bad please It's not good IMO. It's the same as saying I've bought my season ticket for next year. I wouldn't expect to lose that ticket as I'm not a creditor - I've already paid in advance for the service. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calgacus 8 Posted February 17, 2012 Share Posted February 17, 2012 so they've bought assets that don't exist yet? and what if the club decides not to issue season tickets for those seats and simply issues tickets on a game by game basis? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.