Frankie 8,220 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Is there any sign of the minutes from the meeting that the VB guys had with Whyte? Have they been issued on the VB site yet? Don't think so. Not sure of the delay. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted February 10, 2012 Author Share Posted February 10, 2012 We are a long way from the end of this chapter in our history, IMO things will get a lot worse before they get better. But surely it is better we go down that road knowing the truth, the whole truth no matter who it hurts. Everything should be up for scrutiny, from DM to CW. It must be better for Rangers in the long run. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears 0 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Is there any sign of the minutes from the meeting that the VB guys had with Whyte? Have they been issued on the VB site yet? They're waiting on the draft being returned from CW 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted February 10, 2012 Author Share Posted February 10, 2012 Im not sure that this is fair. All the Assembly guys can do is ask the questions and report back on what was said. Perhaps the questions were not as probing as they could have been but that's just down to them not having a detailed financial knowledge and not because they wanted to give CW an easy ride. I don't agree. The Chairman confirmed the borrowing was over a three-year period and was secured against one of his companies and not Rangers Football Club. You don't need financial knowledge to ask which company. It is the questions people will not answer that are the most interesting. As I said all so civilized. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darthter 542 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 You don't need financial knowledge to ask which company. Does it REALLY matter which company it is??? I'm sure checks would have been made before completing the deal to ensure coverage!!! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted February 10, 2012 Author Share Posted February 10, 2012 Does it REALLY matter which company it is??? I'm sure checks would have been made before completing the deal to ensure coverage!!! It depends if you trust him. I don't so yes, I would like to know what securities he has given Ticketus. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears 0 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 It depends if you trust him. I don't so yes, I would like to know what securities he has given Ticketus. Ones that they obviously trust? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ascender 352 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 He's confirmed there that win or lose the tax case, that decision will inevitably lead to appeals which means there's no quick resolution in sight. So does that mean he might be looking to force the issue by going in to administration before that even happens? He's obviously planned for all eventualities from the start and gone in to this with his eyes open, so I'm guessing this would be one option he'd have considered? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,083 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Ones that they obviously trust? Perhaps the systems operated by Ticketus are not infallible. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears 0 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Perhaps the systems operated by Ticketus are not infallible. Highly unlikely, but is'nt everthing/one? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.