Danny 0 Posted November 28, 2011 Share Posted November 28, 2011 Which is it Danny ? Because you suggested two different opinions. It isnt being facetious, it is pointing out that you are being contrarian with yourself. It is as Ian says, if you dont like it, if you dont like Leggo, if you dont like his blog, then just ignore the thread. The thread title is there for all to see and we ALL know what it is about - so if you dont like it then just ignore. It is that simple. I don't mind Leggo, but I'm not keen on his blog. But that's not my point - why post a new thread with the same url every single time he posts a new article? It's like me posting "www.stv.co.uk" every time I think a story is of interest to the forum on stv - I wouldn't do that - I'd do what Ian does in his other very useful posts - I'd post a new thread containing either the content of the story or the direct url to the story, or post one dedicated thread to all stories from that site. It's hard to ignore about 5 or 6 threads all on the main page of Rangers chat, Craig. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 0 Posted November 28, 2011 Share Posted November 28, 2011 For some reason I can't get onto page 3 Few database errors as well. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted November 28, 2011 Share Posted November 28, 2011 I don't mind Leggo, but I'm not keen on his blog. But that's not my point - why post a new thread with the same url every single time he posts a new article? It's like me posting "www.stv.co.uk" every time I think a story is of interest to the forum on stv - I wouldn't do that - I'd do what Ian does in his other very useful posts - I'd post a new thread containing either the content of the story or the direct url to the story, or post one dedicated thread to all stories from that site. It's hard to ignore about 5 or 6 threads all on the main page of Rangers chat, Craig. That is a fair enough point Danny. The reason Ian does it is to gain hits for Leggo's site - seeing as Leggo is about the only journo, or pseudo-journo, that seems to be pro-Rangers Ian likes to see him get hits. This is why Ian doesnt post the content of the article, to attract hits to the site. It is fairly innocuous - and harmless, but I do get the point, especially as Leggo has been blogging with a vengeance since his injury. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.