Danny 0 Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 Just trying to sell papers. And succeeding in doing so I'd wager. Fact is I've never heard of any club being deducted that amount for administration - 10 is the standard deduction. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 If we were 40pts clear then that figure would be 50pts deduction!!! And still win the league. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 Funny thing is... THEY talk about how we should have 45 titles (54 minus the 9 we won in 9IAR... due to us spending outwith our means... despite the debt not appearing till AFTER 9IAR). THEY also try to deduct titles from us for the last couple of years due to "ref/masonic bias". What they dont do though is deduct the 2008 title when "Sporting integrity FC" had to play their games by a certain time so they could make their commitment to a Japanese tour, which funnily enough never materialised. If we were deducted points this season and they won the league, they would see it as a victory, not a win by default. Sporting integrity indeed. My arse Liewell ! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
metlika 0 Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 Just trying to sell papers. And succeeding in doing so I'd wager. Fact is I've never heard of any club being deducted that amount for administration - 10 is the standard deduction. Dundee got 25 but that was their second time in a short period, thats why they are scaremongering. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dutchy Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 The operative word in that report, and many others is could. As far as titles go craig, we should start a campaign to have the titles we won during the war added to our total. It may have been a mixture of players, but it was still Rangers FC. lol 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,382 Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 But it is understood if Rangers are taken into administration before the outcome of the tax case has been completed they could escape the extra penalty. Such a move would leave the club with a CVA and no one to contest it since Whyte would be the main creditor and only 10 points would be deducted. Why would Rangers be taken into administration before the tax case? I don't believe that the directors of a company can put the company into administration just because they feel like it. Is the club unable to pay the debts due at the moment or over, say, the next 6 months? I'm also yet to be convinced that any potential HMRC debt would simply disappear just because the club went into administration before the conclusion of the case. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darthter 542 Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 I don't believe that the directors of a company can put the company into administration just because they feel like it. Is the club unable to pay the debts due at the moment or over, say, the next 6 months? Could it not be the case that CW's parent company, which holds the current debts, could effectively demand payment now. The club wouldn't be able to pay and therefore go into administration. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,382 Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 Could it not be the case that CW's parent company, which holds the current debts, could effectively demand payment now. The club wouldn't be able to pay and therefore go into administration. They can't. if the Club has not suffered an insolvency event within 90 days of the Club's appeal in relation to the tax claim brought against the Club by HM Revenue & Customs (the "Tax Case") being finally determined, then The Rangers FC Group will ... waive the debt that it has acquired 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darthter 542 Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 They can't. Is that not AFTER the tax case has been heard. I was referring to voluntary administration, before the case is heard ie. CW's parent company forces the club into Administration before HMRC does.... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kenzie1 0 Posted October 28, 2011 Share Posted October 28, 2011 What unadulterated drivel. But it's from Keevins, so nothing new there, then. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.